---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107530/#review23743
---
I've tested it with Kexi. Does its job quite nice already. Apar
On 19 December 2012 20:14, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>
>> I propose to move to QAbstractMessageHandler. I use this pattern in
>> Kexi as well.
>
>
> Well, this is kdelibs stuff -- not our own messageboxes, but in general,
> yes, I think we should activel
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
I propose to move to QAbstractMessageHandler. I use this pattern in
Kexi as well.
Well, this is kdelibs stuff -- not our own messageboxes, but in general,
yes, I think we should actively refactor to make sure
QAbstractMessageHandler is used.
Bou
On 19 December 2012 19:21, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 December 2012 Dec, Inge Wallin wrote:
>
>> Whatever happens I would be very against "contaminating" koodf with UI stuff.
>> :)
>>
>> I don't know if it's formally defined anywhere, but for me koodf is classes
>> that represent var
On Wednesday 19 December 2012 Dec, Inge Wallin wrote:
> Whatever happens I would be very against "contaminating" koodf with UI stuff.
> :)
>
> I don't know if it's formally defined anywhere, but for me koodf is classes
> that represent various entities inside an ODF file and classes that help l
On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 15:10:27 Inge Wallin wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 15:01:50 C. Boemann wrote:
> > Yes, I don't disagree that this is the goal we want in the end, but I'm
> > not willing to spend time implementing that now. It's too huge a task.
> > however it would be ni
On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 14:42:33 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 December 2012 Dec, C. Boemann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 December 2012 13:26:33 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > > On 19 December 2012 13:19, C. Boemann wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 19 December 2012 13:11:51 Jaroslaw Stani
On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 15:01:50 C. Boemann wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 December 2012 10:41:42 Inge Wallin wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 01:55:38 C. Boemann wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > In an attempt to to rework the ui, we have run into a problem:
> > >
> > > KoCreatePathTool in
On Wednesday 19 December 2012 10:41:42 Inge Wallin wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 01:55:38 C. Boemann wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > In an attempt to to rework the ui, we have run into a problem:
> >
> > KoCreatePathTool in libs/flake needs some widgets from libs/widgets
> >
> > however the dep
On Wednesday 19 December 2012 14:42:33 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 December 2012 Dec, C. Boemann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 December 2012 13:26:33 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > > On 19 December 2012 13:19, C. Boemann wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 19 December 2012 13:11:51 Jaroslaw Staniek
On Wednesday 19 December 2012 Dec, C. Boemann wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 December 2012 13:26:33 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > On 19 December 2012 13:19, C. Boemann wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 19 December 2012 13:11:51 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > >> On 19 December 2012 12:59, C. Boemann wrote:
> > >> >
On Wednesday 19 December 2012 13:40:46 Pierre Stirnweiss wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:19 PM, C. Boemann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 December 2012 13:11:51 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > > On 19 December 2012 12:59, C. Boemann wrote:
> > > > Yes i'm not attached to alpine in any way. I couldn't
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:19 PM, C. Boemann wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 December 2012 13:11:51 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > On 19 December 2012 12:59, C. Boemann wrote:
> > > Yes i'm not attached to alpine in any way. I couldn't come up with a
> > > generic name that describes the library very well
On Wednesday 19 December 2012 13:26:33 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 19 December 2012 13:19, C. Boemann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 December 2012 13:11:51 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> >> On 19 December 2012 12:59, C. Boemann wrote:
> >> > Yes i'm not attached to alpine in any way. I couldn't come up w
On 19 December 2012 13:19, C. Boemann wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 December 2012 13:11:51 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>> On 19 December 2012 12:59, C. Boemann wrote:
>> > Yes i'm not attached to alpine in any way. I couldn't come up with a
>> > generic name that describes the library very well ( and no f
On Wednesday 19 December 2012 13:11:51 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 19 December 2012 12:59, C. Boemann wrote:
> > Yes i'm not attached to alpine in any way. I couldn't come up with a
> > generic name that describes the library very well ( and no flaketools
> > doesn't unless we wan to have many su
On 19 December 2012 12:59, C. Boemann wrote:
> Yes i'm not attached to alpine in any way. I couldn't come up with a generic
> name that describes the library very well ( and no flaketools doesn't unless
> we
> wan to have many such similarly named libraries) and so when i wrote the mail
> that w
On Wednesday 19 December 2012 11:36:36 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 19 December 2012 10:41, Inge Wallin wrote:
> > All this said, I think a refactor could be a good idea. But why not make
> > a meaningful name? libflaketools should be obvious enough; alpine is
> > justa bit too clever for me.
>
On Wednesday 19 December 2012 10:03:24 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 December 2012 Dec, C. Boemann wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > In an attempt to to rework the ui, we have run into a problem:
> >
> > KoCreatePathTool in libs/flake needs some widgets from libs/widgets
> >
> > however the depen
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107800/
---
(Updated Dec. 19, 2012, 11 a.m.)
Review request for Calligra.
Changes
--
> On Dec. 14, 2012, 4:33 p.m., Marijn Kruisselbrink wrote:
> > LGTM
When commtting please use this patch, to avoid conflict on my local branch,
using git am (not patch -p1 < etc.diff):
http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/calligra-devel/attachments/20121214/1a18be63/attachment.patch
- Philip
On 19 December 2012 10:41, Inge Wallin wrote:
> All this said, I think a refactor could be a good idea. But why not make a
> meaningful name? libflaketools should be obvious enough; alpine is justa bit
> too clever for me.
+1 for any obvious name
please note the case of libprison - a barcode l
On 19 December 2012 10:03, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 December 2012 Dec, C. Boemann wrote:
>
>> Hi
>
>>
>
>> In an attempt to to rework the ui, we have run into a problem:
>
>>
>
>> KoCreatePathTool in libs/flake needs some widgets from libs/widgets
>
>>
>
>> however the dependency i
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> **
>
> On Wednesday 19 December 2012 Dec, C. Boemann wrote:
>
> > Hi
>
> >
>
> > In an attempt to to rework the ui, we have run into a problem:
>
> >
>
> > KoCreatePathTool in libs/flake needs some widgets from libs/widgets
>
> >
>
> > ho
On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 01:55:38 C. Boemann wrote:
> Hi
>
> In an attempt to to rework the ui, we have run into a problem:
>
> KoCreatePathTool in libs/flake needs some widgets from libs/widgets
>
> however the dependency is in the opposite direction
>
> So unless we want to move the to
On Wednesday 19 December 2012 Dec, C. Boemann wrote:
> Hi
>
> In an attempt to to rework the ui, we have run into a problem:
>
> KoCreatePathTool in libs/flake needs some widgets from libs/widgets
>
> however the dependency is in the opposite direction
>
> So unless we want to move the tools in
26 matches
Mail list logo