On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:19 PM, C. Boemann <c...@boemann.dk> wrote: > On Wednesday 19 December 2012 13:11:51 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > On 19 December 2012 12:59, C. Boemann <c...@boemann.dk> wrote: > > > Yes i'm not attached to alpine in any way. I couldn't come up with a > > > generic name that describes the library very well ( and no flaketools > > > doesn't unless we wan to have many such similarly named libraries) and > > > so when i wrote the mail that was just a codename that sprung to mind. > > > > After re-reading your initial post, how about: basictools or > generictools? > but since it may grow to hold shapes and dockers too i would find something > named tools misleading > _______________________________________________ > calligra-devel mailing list > calligra-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel >
basicflakes then? However, I think we are putting the cart before the horses there. Shouldn't we first agree on a structure before discussing labels? Pierre
_______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
