On Wednesday 19 December 2012 11:36:36 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 19 December 2012 10:41, Inge Wallin <i...@lysator.liu.se> wrote: > > All this said, I think a refactor could be a good idea. But why not make > > a meaningful name? libflaketools should be obvious enough; alpine is > > justa bit too clever for me. > > +1 for any obvious name > > please note the case of libprison - a barcode lib that is not even > used by kbarcode - I don't know perhaps because of the clever but > misleading name ;) Yes i'm not attached to alpine in any way. I couldn't come up with a generic name that describes the library very well ( and no flaketools doesn't unless we wan to have many such similarly named libraries) and so when i wrote the mail that was just a codename that sprung to mind.
_______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
