---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106093/
---
(Updated Aug. 19, 2012, 10:23 p.m.)
Review request for Calligra.
Changes
> On Aug. 19, 2012, 9:59 p.m., Inge Wallin wrote:
> > Yes, I agree with Boemann. This is fine and ok to commit after you fix the
> > one thing that I commented on below.
Hmm, seems that review board removed my comment. It was that the coding
standards demands spaces around operators. There are
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106070/#review17725
---
Ship it!
Yes, I agree with Boemann. This is fine and ok to com
On Sunday 19 August 2012 15:40:25 André Wöbbeking wrote:
> On Sunday 19 August 2012 11:38:52 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > On Saturday 18 August 2012 Aug, André Wöbbeking wrote:
> > > P.S.: Please CC me.
> >
> > Like this? I don't get the warnings myself so I am not sure.
>
> Don't know whether I ge
On Sunday 19 August 2012 11:38:52 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Saturday 18 August 2012 Aug, André Wöbbeking wrote:
> > P.S.: Please CC me.
>
> Like this? I don't get the warnings myself so I am not sure.
Don't know whether I get it because I'm using GCC 4.7 or due to some flags.
> diff --git a/li
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106084/#review17724
---
This review has been submitted with commit
bba689de5fd185c90ec
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106070/#review17722
---
>From my point of view it looks good to go.
- C. Boemann
On
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106084/#review17721
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- C. Boemann
On Aug. 19, 2012, 11:16 a.m.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106093/
---
Review request for Calligra.
Description
---
GSoC work on Animation T
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106091/
---
Review request for Calligra.
Description
---
GSoC work on Animation T
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106064/#review17716
---
This review has been submitted with commit
29d5bb338ad1d6fd899
> On Aug. 19, 2012, 1:50 p.m., José Luis Vergara wrote:
> > I just turned this patch into a branch called
> > author-testpatch-pentalis
> > So others can test. I will review in a moment, after I finish testing.
I tested:
The branch compiled correctly -- check
calligraauthor and calligrawords sto
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106064/#review17714
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- José Luis Vergara
On Aug. 19, 2012, 6:2
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106064/#review17710
---
I just turned this patch into a branch called
author-testpatch-
> On Aug. 19, 2012, 1:08 p.m., Arjen Hiemstra wrote:
> > Two things glare at me from this patch:
> >
> > - Why put it into Words' directory instead of its own top level? The goal
> > for this is - as I understand it - to become a separate application, so why
> > not start off the right way? If
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106064/#review17706
---
Two things glare at me from this patch:
- Why put it into Word
On Sunday, August 19, 2012 12:50:18 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> On Sunday 19 Aug 2012, Inge Wallin wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 07, 2012 10:10:14 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Here is the suggested schedule for 2.6:
> > >
> > > September 7th alpha tagging
> > > September 28
On Sunday 19 Aug 2012, Inge Wallin wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 07, 2012 10:10:14 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is the suggested schedule for 2.6:
> >
> > September 7th alpha tagging
> > September 28th branch+beta tagging
> > October 19th RC tagging
> >
> > Release expected ear
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106084/
---
Review request for Calligra.
Description
---
QFormLayout slightly imp
On Sunday 19 August 2012 11:38:52 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> +uint zIndex : 16; // keep maxZIndex in sync!
> +uint runThrough : 16;
I'm quite sure these values can get negative
I think he only talked about int :1 values
Thorsten
___
calligra-de
On Saturday 18 August 2012 Aug, André Wöbbeking wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when compiling Calligra I get:
>
> calligra/libs/flake/KoShape.cpp: In constructor
> 'KoShapePrivate::KoShapePrivate(KoShape*)':
> calligra/libs/flake/KoShape.cpp:105:48: warning: overflow in implicit
> constant conversion [-Wover
Hi,
Are there any plans to switch stable branch of Calligra translations to
2.5 and enable translation for master/2.6?
Thanks in advance for your answers.
Best regards,
Yuri
___
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.or
On Tuesday, August 07, 2012 10:10:14 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the suggested schedule for 2.6:
>
> September 7th alpha tagging
> September 28th branch+beta tagging
> October 19th RC tagging
>
> Release expected early November
I have a problem with this schedule.
Calligra 2.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105988/#review17693
---
This review has been submitted with commit
eed23b52711243bee7e
24 matches
Mail list logo
