Re: Review Request: Fix drawing of shadows for shapes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104615/#review12625 --- I found a problem with the drawing of the shadow of a rotated r

Re: Improvement of the styles handling in Calligra

On Tuesday, April 17, 2012 03:27:39 Inge Wallin wrote: > On Monday, April 16, 2012 05:27:46 Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Sunday, April 15, 2012 22:36:13 Inge Wallin wrote: > > > I wrote some documentation during the weekend at > > > http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Code/Styles.

Re: obsolete stuff

Hello, On Tuesday, April 17, 2012 16:57:42 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > stage: > > svg > genericimageexport > words > ooimpress > magicpoint > kpr > ooppt I don't know about most of the stuff but at least magicpoint and kpr are compiled as far as I can see. Also kpr is working and I s

Re: Review Request: Fix Historical Name of Date Basis and wrong sepperator used in financial.xml

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104645/#review12615 --- This review has been submitted with commit 6e1d46f43e9b543b082

Re: Review Request: Fix Historical Name of Date Basis and wrong sepperator used in financial.xml

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104645/#review12613 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Marijn Kruisselbrink On April 17, 2012,

Re: Review Request: tune KoUnit API (and have pagelayout dialog and Words' horizontal ruler context menu update to changes of the document's unit type)

> On April 17, 2012, 4:17 a.m., C. Boemann wrote: > > libs/odf/KoUnit.h, line 80 > > > > > > Maybe make this into QFlags, if we want as you Say to have imperial vs > > metric too; > > btw for the ui list it may

Re: Please give branch "tuneKoUnitAPI" a quick test with your fav. program

Am Dienstag, 17. April 2012, 18:40:43 schrieb C. Boemann: > On Tuesday 17 April 2012 17:38:14 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > Hi, > > > > my patch to improve the KoUnit API a little and ensure consistent display > > of th unit types all over Calligra (see > > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/1

Re: Please give branch "tuneKoUnitAPI" a quick test with your fav. program

On Tuesday 17 April 2012 17:38:14 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > Hi, > > my patch to improve the KoUnit API a little and ensure consistent display > of th unit types all over Calligra (see > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104626/) is a little bit larger and > touches a lot of files all over t

Re: Review Request: New shape for 1-D and 2-D barcodes

> On April 17, 2012, 7:10 a.m., Inge Wallin wrote: > > Was this committed? I don't remember. In any case, please close this > > request. No, was not yet commited. I found out that the shape is not yet really ready for prime-time for some reasons, at least to my standards. Initially wanted to

Re: please in the future push as one commit

Am Dienstag, 17. April 2012, 17:44:49 schrieb C. Boemann: > On Tuesday 17 April 2012 17:42:45 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 17. April 2012, 17:34:00 schrieb C. Boemann: > > > Please make sure that commits that don't work on their own is _never_ > > > commited on their own > > >

Re: obsolete stuff

Am Dienstag, 17. April 2012, 16:57:42 schrieb Boudewijn Rempt: > Plugins: > >commentshape -- is this available in any application? >musicshape -- Mek, are you still maintaining this? >paragraphtool (great idea, unmaintained, does not compile) >reporting/shape -- unfinished >sca

Re: please in the future push as one commit

On Tuesday 17 April 2012 17:42:45 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > Am Dienstag, 17. April 2012, 17:34:00 schrieb C. Boemann: > > Please make sure that commits that don't work on their own is _never_ > > commited on their own > > > > If someone checks out in between your commits now Calligra will

Re: please in the future push as one commit

Am Dienstag, 17. April 2012, 17:34:00 schrieb C. Boemann: > Please make sure that commits that don't work on their own is _never_ > commited on their own > > If someone checks out in between your commits now Calligra will not build. > Which ruins any chance of using bisect. > > :( Hm, after any

Re: obsolete stuff

>musicshape -- Mek, are you still maintaining this? It still works. As long it is not broken,why remove it? ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel

Please give branch "tuneKoUnitAPI" a quick test with your fav. program

Hi, my patch to improve the KoUnit API a little and ensure consistent display of th unit types all over Calligra (see http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104626/) is a little bit larger and touches a lot of files all over the codebase. So please help boemann with the review and check-out that bran

please in the future push as one commit

Please make sure that commits that don't work on their own is _never_ commited on their own If someone checks out in between your commits now Calligra will not build. Which ruins any chance of using bisect. :( ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra

Re: Feature plans for 2.4 and 2.5

On 17 April 2012 16:44, Cyrille Berger wrote: > I wonder if the current format of features plan should be kept. The reason > we use the current format is that we had soft freezes (when no new features > are started), so we needed a way to keep track on what needed to be > finished. > > To me it wo

Re: Review Request: tune KoUnit API (and have pagelayout dialog and Words' horizontal ruler context menu update to changes of the document's unit type)

> On April 17, 2012, 4:17 a.m., C. Boemann wrote: > > I like it very much, and I found only a few issues. Before we merge this > > however, I think it should be made public in a branch sopeople can test > > build it beforehand. After all there may be parts of the code that you > > don't build

Re: obsolete stuff

On Tuesday 17 April 2012 16:57:42 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > Here's a quick list of stuff in calligra that I am fairly sure is > unmaintained and won't be maintained any time soon. I would propose > to remove all of this and create a wiki page that lists what was > removed in which commit, so people

obsolete stuff

Here's a quick list of stuff in calligra that I am fairly sure is unmaintained and won't be maintained any time soon. I would propose to remove all of this and create a wiki page that lists what was removed in which commit, so people who are interested can always get it back. Right now, it's ofte

Re: Feature plans for 2.4 and 2.5

I wonder if the current format of features plan should be kept. The reason we use the current format is that we had soft freezes (when no new features are started), so we needed a way to keep track on what needed to be finished. To me it would seem better to have a singe page, with the following i

Re: gcc 4.7

Giving the second variable a new name was my second guess. :) Thanks for the correction. I'm packaging it up for Arch. =-Jameson ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel

Re: gcc 4.7

On Tuesday 17 April 2012 Apr, Jameson wrote: > In order to build the stable release on my system, I needed the > attached patch. I'm not much of a C++ programmer, so I'm not sure if > it breaks anything. Could someone take a look at it? That's not quite right, but thanks for the warning, I'll f

Re: Wikipedia preparation for 2.4 release

Thanks for the feedback so far. I could still use a few updated screenshots, most notably Calligra Mobile, Calligra Active and Flow. I also have a question regarding licenses. Kexi is described on WP to be under "mostly LGPL, minor use of GPL". Where is that minor GPL use? I can't find it in th

gcc 4.7

In order to build the stable release on my system, I needed the attached patch. I'm not much of a C++ programmer, so I'm not sure if it breaks anything. Could someone take a look at it? Thanks, =-Jameson pole.patch Description: Binary data ___ calli

Review Request: Fix Historical Name of Date Basis and wrong sepperator used in financial.xml

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104645/ --- Review request for Calligra, Marijn Kruisselbrink and Sebastian Sauer. Des

Re: Review Request: Fix drawing of shadows for shapes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104615/ --- (Updated April 17, 2012, 10:32 a.m.) Review request for Calligra, Yue Liu,

Re: LO/Calligra compared

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:15 AM, todd rme wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Markus wrote: >> Am Dienstag 17 April 2012, 09:11:24 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek: >>> http://www.datamation.com/open-source/open-source-office-apps-calligra-suite >>> -vs-libreoffice-1.html >> >> Page 2 loading for

Re: LO/Calligra compared

Works here...Chrome + Firefox :) On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Markus wrote: > Am Dienstag 17 April 2012, 09:11:24 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek: > > > http://www.datamation.com/open-source/open-source-office-apps-calligra-suite > > -vs-libreoffice-1.html > > Page 2 loading for anybody? >

Re: LO/Calligra compared

On Tuesday, April 17, 2012 11:08:52 Markus wrote: > Am Dienstag 17 April 2012, 09:11:24 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek: > > http://www.datamation.com/open-source/open-source-office-apps-calligra-su > > ite -vs-libreoffice-1.html > > Page 2 loading for anybody? > _

Re: LO/Calligra compared

Works with chrome On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Markus wrote: > Am Dienstag 17 April 2012, 09:11:24 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek: > > > http://www.datamation.com/open-source/open-source-office-apps-calligra-suite > > -vs-libreoffice-1.html > > Page 2 loading for anybody? > ___

Re: LO/Calligra compared

Am Dienstag, 17. April 2012, 11:08:52 schrieb Markus: > Am Dienstag 17 April 2012, 09:11:24 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek: > > http://www.datamation.com/open-source/open-source-office-apps-calligra-su > > ite -vs-libreoffice-1.html > > Page 2 loading for anybody? Yes, with Konqueror (trunk+4.8 compile

Re: LO/Calligra compared

works here, Firefox On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Stephanie Das Gupta < stephaniedasgu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 04/17/2012 02:45 PM, todd rme wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Markus wrote: >> >>> Am Dienstag 17 April 2012, 09:11:24 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek: >>> http://www.d

Re: LO/Calligra compared

not for me using n9 -- Sent from my Nokia N9 On 17/04/2012 10:17 Stephanie Das Gupta wrote: On 04/17/2012 02:45 PM, todd rme wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Markus wrote: > >> Am Dienstag 17 April 2012, 09:11:24 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek: >> >>> http://www.datamation.com/**open-sourc

Re: LO/Calligra compared

On 04/17/2012 02:45 PM, todd rme wrote: On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Markus wrote: Am Dienstag 17 April 2012, 09:11:24 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek: http://www.datamation.com/open-source/open-source-office-apps-calligra-suite -vs-libreoffice-1.html Page 2 loading for anybody? Not for me, an

Re: LO/Calligra compared

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Markus wrote: > Am Dienstag 17 April 2012, 09:11:24 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek: >> http://www.datamation.com/open-source/open-source-office-apps-calligra-suite >> -vs-libreoffice-1.html > > Page 2 loading for anybody? Not for me, and I've tried it on firefox, rekon

Re: LO/Calligra compared

Am Dienstag 17 April 2012, 09:11:24 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek: > http://www.datamation.com/open-source/open-source-office-apps-calligra-suite > -vs-libreoffice-1.html Page 2 loading for anybody? ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https

Re: Demo documents to help showcase Calligra - where to store + thoughts?

On 17 April 2012 09:24, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Monday 16 April 2012 Apr, Stuart Dickson wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've created a small selection of sample documents to help showcase >> Calligra and related software. >> >> The intention was for some more creative and less dry sample documents, >> so

Re: Demo documents to help showcase Calligra - where to store + thoughts?

On Monday 16 April 2012 Apr, Stuart Dickson wrote: > Hi, > > I've created a small selection of sample documents to help showcase > Calligra and related software. > > The intention was for some more creative and less dry sample documents, > so they are a mix of "family friendly" and creative wor

Re: Improvement of the styles handling in Calligra

On Tuesday 17 April 2012 09:05:39 Inge Wallin wrote: > On Tuesday, April 17, 2012 07:09:51 C. Boemann wrote: > > On Tuesday 17 April 2012 03:27:39 Inge Wallin wrote: > > > > If a inherited style overwrites one property of a style e.g. the > > > > color a new KoShapeBackground would be set in the in

Re: Review Request: Fix drawing of shadows for shapes

> On April 16, 2012, 11:45 p.m., Inge Wallin wrote: > > I may not understand the problem fully, but it seems that not only does it > > paint the shadow too big but it also doesn't take the shadow into account > > when laying out out the text. There is a method KoShape::boundingRect() > > whos

LO/Calligra compared

http://www.datamation.com/open-source/open-source-office-apps-calligra-suite-vs-libreoffice-1.html -- regards / pozdrawiam, Jaroslaw Staniek  http://www.linkedin.com/in/jstaniek  Kexi & Calligra (kexi-project.org, identi.ca/kexi, calligra-suite.org)  KDE Software Development Platform on MS Window

Re: Review Request: Fix drawing of shadows for shapes

> On April 16, 2012, 11:45 p.m., Inge Wallin wrote: > > I may not understand the problem fully, but it seems that not only does it > > paint the shadow too big but it also doesn't take the shadow into account > > when laying out out the text. There is a method KoShape::boundingRect() > > whos

Re: Review Request: New shape for 1-D and 2-D barcodes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104235/#review12556 --- Was this committed? I don't remember. In any case, please close

Re: Improvement of the styles handling in Calligra

On Tuesday, April 17, 2012 07:09:51 C. Boemann wrote: > On Tuesday 17 April 2012 03:27:39 Inge Wallin wrote: > > > If a inherited style overwrites one property of a style e.g. the color > > > a new KoShapeBackground would be set in the inherited style. > > > > That could work, yes. It will be some