On Wednesday 11 April 2012 Apr, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For me this is how it should be: commits in master are restricted to:
>
> * single commit bug fixes
> * merge from feature branches (or single commit feature, note that I
> personnaly don't encourage this practise)
Same here
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104553/
---
Review request for Calligra and Thorsten Zachmann.
Description
---
Th
On Tuesday 10 Apr 2012, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> There are implications of such short release cycle however. I'd like
> to focus on just one today. Work on two or more versions can happen
> concurrently so it's important to have features easily moveable
> between releases since we're going to chan
Hi,
For me this is how it should be: commits in master are restricted to:
* single commit bug fixes
* merge from feature branches (or single commit feature, note that I
personnaly don't encourage this practise)
Then the amount of reviewing for commits or merge is left at the discretion of
the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104550/#review12332
---
This review has been submitted with commit
2afa41e52aab2afee01
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104549/#review12333
---
This review has been submitted with commit
ce5fdccc4a39a1591fa
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104550/#review12331
---
Ship it!
Yes, I think it's nicer this way.
- Boudewijn Rempt
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104549/#review12330
---
Ship it!
I like it.
- Boudewijn Rempt
On April 11, 2012, 4:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104550/
---
Review request for Calligra.
Description
---
IMHO the term "Shadow" i
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104549/
---
Review request for Calligra.
Description
---
Looks less cluttered.
Co
On Wednesday 11 April 2012 Apr, Stephanie Das Gupta wrote:
> I've looked through and corrected what I saw was wrong, with the
> exception of KChart and KFormulas because I have no idea what would need
> to be corrected there. So if someone could look at those that'd be great.
Neither exist anym
On 04/11/2012 06:19 PM, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2012, 13:42:55 schrieb Markus:
Am Mittwoch 11 April 2012, 13:19:49 schrieb Friedrich W. H. Kossebau:
So this is how Wikipedia works these days, everyone writes articles about
their own stuff?
Well, I'm not a Calligr
Den 11 april 2012 14:49 skrev Friedrich W. H. Kossebau :
> Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2012, 13:42:55 schrieb Markus:
>> Am Mittwoch 11 April 2012, 13:19:49 schrieb Friedrich W. H. Kossebau:
>> > So this is how Wikipedia works these days, everyone writes articles about
>> > their own stuff?
>>
>> Well,
Am Mittwoch 11 April 2012, 14:49:16 schrieb Friedrich W. H. Kossebau:
> Hm. Just that this blurs the real name a little. If I had to decide, I would
> insist in the full name everywhere, no made up short forms.
Well, there is a difference between wrong and abbreviated.
Eg. "KDE 4.8.2 was released
On 04/11/2012 06:19 PM, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2012, 13:42:55 schrieb Markus:
Am Mittwoch 11 April 2012, 13:19:49 schrieb Friedrich W. H. Kossebau:
So this is how Wikipedia works these days, everyone writes articles about
their own stuff?
Well, I'm not a Calligr
On 11 April 2012 14:49, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2012, 13:42:55 schrieb Markus:
>> Am Mittwoch 11 April 2012, 13:19:49 schrieb Friedrich W. H. Kossebau:
>> > So this is how Wikipedia works these days, everyone writes articles about
>> > their own stuff?
>>
>> Well,
Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2012, 13:42:55 schrieb Markus:
> Am Mittwoch 11 April 2012, 13:19:49 schrieb Friedrich W. H. Kossebau:
> > So this is how Wikipedia works these days, everyone writes articles about
> > their own stuff?
>
> Well, I'm not a Calligra author (in fact I'm longer a Wikipedian than
Am Mittwoch 11 April 2012, 13:19:49 schrieb Friedrich W. H. Kossebau:
> So this is how Wikipedia works these days, everyone writes articles about
> their own stuff?
Well, I'm not a Calligra author (in fact I'm longer a Wikipedian than a KDE
member). The best way for official members is to publis
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
Hi Markus,
Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2012, 02:59:07 schrieb Markus:
Hi.
In the past months I worked to get the Calligra Wikipedia articles into
shape. Could you please review https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calligra_Suite
as well as the Component
Hi Markus,
Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2012, 02:59:07 schrieb Markus:
> Hi.
> In the past months I worked to get the Calligra Wikipedia articles into
> shape. Could you please review https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calligra_Suite
> as well as the Components' articles?
> In some cases newer screenshots wo
20 matches
Mail list logo
