Den 11 april 2012 14:49 skrev Friedrich W. H. Kossebau <kosse...@kde.org>: > Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2012, 13:42:55 schrieb Markus: >> Am Mittwoch 11 April 2012, 13:19:49 schrieb Friedrich W. H. Kossebau: >> > So this is how Wikipedia works these days, everyone writes articles about >> > their own stuff? >> >> Well, I'm not a Calligra author (in fact I'm longer a Wikipedian than a KDE >> member). > > Ah, okay, sorry, do not yet have a complete picture of all the people involved > in Calligra, so misassumed here. > >> The best way for official members is to publish a blog post about >> fact that Wikipedia authors can use as reference. Eg. I have to admit that I >> called Words a fork of KWord on WP because the early Calligra website >> called Words "a word processor created from KWord" or something like that. >> It required a blog post by Boemann to get that straight. > > :) > >> > * Sometimes only half of the program names are used, like just "Words" or >> > "Sheets". But that should be always "Calligra Words" or "Calligra Sheets", >> > as this is the official full name. >> >> IMO that's part of editorial judgment for better readability. In their >> dedicated articles the actual names are explained, eg. "Calligra Words" is >> one article but another is "Karbon (software)". >> LibreOffice has something similar: >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LibreOffice#Included_applications >> That table calls the word processor Writer but its article states that the >> full name is LibreOffice Writer. > > Hm. Just that this blurs the real name a little. If I had to decide, I would > insist in the full name everywhere, no made up short forms. > > After all the LibreOffice authors use the short forms you mention themselves, > see e.g. http://www.libreoffice.org/features/writer/ > > This is different in Calligra. Its e.g. always "Calligra Words". Oh wait, not. > At least the urls are just calligra.org/words/, the icon on the first page > have just a short form, and the big picture on e.g. calligra.org/words/ also > has just "Words" in it. Leftovers, or still current state? > > And calligra.org/flow/ is unsure if the full name is "Calligra Flow" or > "Flow". Same for "Calligra Plan". > > userbase.kde.org/Calligra also needs an update, in any case. Anyone working on > this, and would coordinate what is updated by whom? I would spent some time on > that, tonight. > > In general, other real Calligra devs and especially the Calligra marketing > people should better chime in here, while I chime out :)
I'd call you a "real Calligra dev" any day of the week Friedrich! (Sorry just had to protest a little :) Elvis _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
