Re: New logo

2011-11-03 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
yes On 04/11/2011, Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > On Thursday, November 03, 2011 22:58:31 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> On 3 November 2011 22:56, Cyrille Berger Skott >> wrote: >> > On Thursday 03 November 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: >> >> On Thursday 06 October 2011 Oct, Thorsten Zachmann wrote: >> >

Re: New logo

2011-11-03 Thread Thorsten Zachmann
On Thursday, November 03, 2011 22:58:31 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 3 November 2011 22:56, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > > On Thursday 03 November 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > >> On Thursday 06 October 2011 Oct, Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > >> > Hello all, > >> > > >> > here is the logo Eugene h

Re: change to product names in bugzilla

2011-11-03 Thread C. Boemann
On Wednesday 02 November 2011 21:21:25 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > Oh and for sake of consitency, shouldn't we rename calligra-chart, > calligra- common, calligra-formula and calligra-services ? > > On Monday 31 October 2011, C. Boemann wrote: > > Hi > > > > I've changed all those calligra-prod

Re: New logo

2011-11-03 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 3 November 2011 22:50, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > On Thursday 03 November 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> Eugene provided the artwork to use, with kind words "do whatever you >> want with it". >> As for the LGPL part of: if we collectively agree for the license, it >> can be official from t

Re: New logo

2011-11-03 Thread C. Boemann
On Friday 04 November 2011 00:14:30 Markus Slopianka wrote: > On Donnerstag 03 November 2011 22:50:58 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > > LGPL is really a bad idea for artwork... > > No, it's not. The Oxygen team isn't stupid. They chose LGPL for a reason. Thank you for your confidence, but no we didn

Re: New logo

2011-11-03 Thread Markus Slopianka
On Donnerstag 03 November 2011 22:50:58 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > LGPL is really a bad idea for artwork... No, it's not. The Oxygen team isn't stupid. They chose LGPL for a reason. > I would suggest CC-BY-SA, which is > basically like LGPL but for artwork: > > http://creativecommons.org/lic

Re: New logo

2011-11-03 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 3 November 2011 22:56, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > On Thursday 03 November 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: >> On Thursday 06 October 2011 Oct, Thorsten Zachmann wrote: >> > Hello all, >> > >> > here is the logo Eugene has worked on for us. He took our comments and >> > new we can see the result

Re: New logo

2011-11-03 Thread Cyrille Berger Skott
On Thursday 03 November 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Thursday 06 October 2011 Oct, Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > here is the logo Eugene has worked on for us. He took our comments and > > new we can see the result here. That is the time for final comments and > > praise. I h

Re: New logo

2011-11-03 Thread Cyrille Berger Skott
On Thursday 03 November 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > Eugene provided the artwork to use, with kind words "do whatever you > want with it". > As for the LGPL part of: if we collectively agree for the license, it > can be official from today (if we agree to be really informal). > But just a though

Re: New logo

2011-11-03 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 3 November 2011 11:21, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Thursday 03 November 2011 Nov, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> On 3 November 2011 10:19, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: >> > On Thursday 06 October 2011 Oct, Thorsten Zachmann wrote: >> >> Hello all, >> >> >> >> here is the logo Eugene has worked on for us

Re: New logo

2011-11-03 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Thursday 03 November 2011 Nov, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 3 November 2011 10:19, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > On Thursday 06 October 2011 Oct, Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > >> Hello all, > >> > >> here is the logo Eugene has worked on for us. He took our comments and new > >> we > >> can see the

Re: KoGenStyle::rmProperty ?

2011-11-03 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 3 November 2011 10:37, Uzak Matus wrote: > Hi, > > thanks for comments.  I vote for the removeProperty(), removeAttribute() > pair.  If you agree , then I will implement them and make a review request. :) > +1 ! > -- > Matus Uzak > Software Designer > Ixonos Slovakia s.r.o. > Sturova 27, 040

Re: New logo

2011-11-03 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 3 November 2011 10:19, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Thursday 06 October 2011 Oct, Thorsten Zachmann wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> here is the logo Eugene has worked on for us. He took our comments and new we >> can see the result here. That is the time for final comments and praise. I >> hope >> a

RE: KoGenStyle::rmProperty ?

2011-11-03 Thread Uzak Matus
Hi, thanks for comments. I vote for the removeProperty(), removeAttribute() pair. If you agree , then I will implement them and make a review request. :) -- Matus Uzak Software Designer Ixonos Slovakia s.r.o. Sturova 27, 040 01 Kosice, Slovakia mobile 0421 918 718 958 email: matus.u...@ixon

Re: Where's the text tool? was: Re: Krita 2.4 (b3): problems with "Text-Shape" tool

2011-11-03 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Thursday 03 November 2011 Nov, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > Hm... And I going crazy, or did the edit-text tool disappear from the toolbox > with the latest toolbox refactoring. CC'ongcalligra-devel, so boemann can > look at that. Right now, it seems we can edit the text shape only by clicking >

Re: New logo

2011-11-03 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Thursday 06 October 2011 Oct, Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > Hello all, > > here is the logo Eugene has worked on for us. He took our comments and new we > can see the result here. That is the time for final comments and praise. I > hope > all are satisfied with the result. So, when all is sai

Where's the text tool? was: Re: Krita 2.4 (b3): problems with "Text-Shape" tool

2011-11-03 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Tuesday 01 November 2011 Nov, silvio grosso wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have been testing the Text-Shape tool lately. > The one you get inside the Add Shape group. Not the "Artistic text tool" on > the tool bar. > > As usual I work on Krita 2.4 (b3). Ubuntu1.10 - Unity Shell > > IMHO, it is