On Thursday 03 November 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > Eugene provided the artwork to use, with kind words "do whatever you > want with it". > As for the LGPL part of: if we collectively agree for the license, it > can be official from today (if we agree to be really informal). > But just a though: since the Sprint is just in one week maybe you > could delay usage of the logo on that distribution or web page so we > can make final decision on both topics (artwork, logo/trademark) > during the meeting. The outcome would be then one of the news from the > sprint. > You could use generic Calligra Suite text until then instead (or is > this a big problem?). LGPL is really a bad idea for artwork... I would suggest CC-BY-SA, which is basically like LGPL but for artwork:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ -- Cyrille Berger Skott _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel