On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > > On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 29 September 2011, Boudewijn R
On 29 September 2011 23:12, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I've been following a bit the Tizen communication channels to see
>> what is the atmosphere and attitude. I heard someone:
>>
>> "I want to have enough of freedom to run my
On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Hello,
> I've been following a bit the Tizen communication channels to see
> what is the atmosphere and attitude. I heard someone:
>
> "I want to have enough of freedom to run my Libreoffice on the phone."
>
> Couldn't we announce will
Hello,
I've been following a bit the Tizen communication channels to see
what is the atmosphere and attitude. I heard someone:
"I want to have enough of freedom to run my Libreoffice on the phone."
Couldn't we announce willingness (not formal plan) to provide the
office suite for Tizen assuming
On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> > > On Thursday 29 September 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > > > > So any objection to the revert of
> > > > >
On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 September 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > > > So any objection to the revert of
> > > > ef3277a2bd7dd0b9454114d1562b633dff47c86e ?
> > >
> > > Yes, I prefe
On Donnerstag 29 September 2011 13:17:27 Inge Wallin wrote:
> No, one developer is not enough. They have some form of simple vote
> procedure but I haven't worked out the details yet.
Bugzilla has a voting feature. Why not simply look at those?
___
cal
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102737/
---
Review request for Calligra.
Description
---
Make it possible to load
Hi
I've create a little ascii art file that tries to explain the relations when
using the label-alignment mode of text:list-level-position-and-space-mode
How list tab is defined if fixed tabs:
text-indent
|-<|
LABEL TEXT STARTS HERE AND GOES
On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> On Thursday 29 September 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > > So any objection to the revert of
> > > ef3277a2bd7dd0b9454114d1562b633dff47c86e ?
> >
> > Yes, I prefer to delay the tagging of the beta release, instead of causing
> > a m
On Thursday 29 September 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > So any objection to the revert of
> > ef3277a2bd7dd0b9454114d1562b633dff47c86e ?
>
> Yes, I prefer to delay the tagging of the beta release, instead of causing
> a mess for the krita developers by reverting a huge merge.
There are only two
On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> On Thursday 29 September 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > Yes, we have a branch called "master", just like we used to have a branch
> > called "trunk". We don't have any other branch that is related to the
> > release process. We only
Hello all,
as you might already have heard the e.V. is not able to sponsor the sprint
from KDE money. Nokia sponsors the sprint but due to a lot of people from out
of Europe joining the budget was not enough. Luckily Ko GmbH offered to help
with some additional money to the budget so that we sh
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 13:17:27 PM Inge Wallin wrote:
> On Thursday, September 29, 2011 13:13:35 C. Boemann wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 September 2011 12:59:19 Inge Wallin wrote:
> > > LibreOffice has an interesting thing. They have a meta bug that is
> > > made dependent on what they deem
On Thursday 29 September 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> Yes, we have a branch called "master", just like we used to have a branch
> called "trunk". We don't have any other branch that is related to the
> release process. We only have feature branches.
>
> But let it go, this discussion isn't produc
On Thursday 29 September 2011 13:38:49 Markus Slopianka wrote:
> > trouble with these kind of things is that it becomes a "who can shout the
> > loudest" contest.
> >
> > So if there was a good way to measure it i would agree, but nomination by
> > one annoyed user is not it imho.
>
> Well, crash
On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> On Thursday 29 September 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> > > On Thursday 29 September 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Cyrille Be
> trouble with these kind of things is that it becomes a "who can shout the
> loudest" contest.
>
> So if there was a good way to measure it i would agree, but nomination by
> one annoyed user is not it imho.
Well, crashers and data losses are good candidates.
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 13:13:35 C. Boemann wrote:
> On Thursday 29 September 2011 12:59:19 Inge Wallin wrote:
> > LibreOffice has an interesting thing. They have a meta bug that is made
> > dependent on what they deem the most annoying bugs at any given time. I
> > think this is a good i
On Thursday 29 September 2011 12:59:19 Inge Wallin wrote:
> LibreOffice has an interesting thing. They have a meta bug that is made
> dependent on what they deem the most annoying bugs at any given time. I
> think this is a good idea that we could imitate, especially when we are
> getting close t
LibreOffice has an interesting thing. They have a meta bug that is made
dependent on what they deem the most annoying bugs at any given time. I think
this is a good idea that we could imitate, especially when we are getting
close to the release..
Here is the link if anybody wants to check it
On Thursday 29 September 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 September 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > > On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> > > > I am rather convince that our current model (
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102679/
---
(Updated Sept. 29, 2011, 10:16 a.m.)
Review request for Calligra.
Change
On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> On Thursday 29 September 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> > > I am rather convince that our current model (or the one we aim at, ie
> > > master in a releasable state at
On Thursday 29 September 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> > I am rather convince that our current model (or the one we aim at, ie
> > master in a releasable state at all time), but it does require people to
> > accept that their latest
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102679/
---
(Updated Sept. 29, 2011, 9:26 a.m.)
Review request for Calligra.
Changes
On 29 September 2011 09:44, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
>> I am rather convince that our current model (or the one we aim at, ie master
>> in a releasable state at all time), but it does require people to accept that
>> their latest newes
On 29 September 2011 09:22, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> On Thursday 29 September 2011, Inge Wallin wrote:
>> > For faster releases you need something like the merge windows for the
>> > kernel. The problem is that when merge happen to close the beta release,
>> > we get lots of bug reports that
On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> I am rather convince that our current model (or the one we aim at, ie master
> in a releasable state at all time), but it does require people to accept that
> their latest newest shiny super cool feature is less important than shipp
On Thursday 29 September 2011, Inge Wallin wrote:
> > For faster releases you need something like the merge windows for the
> > kernel. The problem is that when merge happen to close the beta release,
> > we get lots of bug reports that are not needed.
We already have "merge window" it is called "f
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 04:19:32 Sven Langkamp wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Cyrille Berger Skott
>
> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 28 September 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 28 September 2011 Sep, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I generall
31 matches
Mail list logo
