On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > > On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > > > > On Thursday 29 September 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > > > > > So any objection to the revert of > > > > > > ef3277a2bd7dd0b9454114d1562b633dff47c86e ? > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I prefer to delay the tagging of the beta release, instead of > > > > > causing > > > > > a mess for the krita developers by reverting a huge merge. > > > > > > > > There are only two commits after that from krita developers, so they > > > > can be > > > > moved to the "krita-bugfixhere" branch, with all krita development. > > > > Also I was > > > > under the impression that everybody agreed that a commit that breaks, > > > > should > > > > either be fixed ASAP or reverted ? > > > > > > Yes, we want to fix it ASAP. That's what I'm telling you. > > > > > > Okay, I might have a temporary patch, but it needs to be tested... I think > > it's the progress updater that is causing the hangs, but it's just a hunch > > and I just tried to paint for five minutes and didn't get a hang. I have no > > theory about why or what. > > > > Scratch that -- apparently it differs which brush we're using. > Z-t-speed_dirty_square still makes the painting part of Krita hang.
Dmitry committed a past last night I knocked up last night which disables progress reporting. For me, this seems to really "fix" (or rather, avoid) the hang. It needs more testing, but I am reasonably confident that with this patch enabled 2.4b2 can, after all, be tagged today. -- Boudewijn Rempt http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org, http://www.boudewijnrempt.nl _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
