On 29 September 2011 09:44, Boudewijn Rempt <b...@valdyas.org> wrote: > On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: >> I am rather convince that our current model (or the one we aim at, ie master >> in a releasable state at all time), but it does require people to accept that >> their latest newest shiny super cool feature is less important than shipping >> a >> finished product to our users, and therefor merge things that are reasonnably >> ready, for which the developers don't know of any major bugs. Maybe we should >> have a long discussion on the development workflow at the next sprint. > > It also means that we need to setup the system of branches we have discussed > before a couple of times already. We don't have that now, with the result > that we are still working as if in svn. > > And there is still the problem that branches don't get enough user testing > which is why we thought that Dmitry's strokes branch was pretty ok. Several > people have tested it, but not thoroughly enough. >
Are we now closer to per-app repos +a 'libs' repo as in Qt 5? Could be useful if someone needs version A of Words, version B of Tables and version C of Kexi. With single repo this is not possible. But is this useful scenario for you, that's another question. -- regards / pozdrawiam, Jaroslaw Staniek http://www.linkedin.com/in/jstaniek Kexi & Calligra (kexi-project.org, identi.ca/kexi, calligra-suite.org) KDE Software Development Platform on MS Windows (windows.kde.org) _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
