Hello,
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:56:14AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:58:53PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > I don't think making nsmux capable of shutting down translators is a
> > hard task in itself: the central problem is tha
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:39:41AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:05:51PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:31:26AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>
> > > And that means: nothing missing, nsm
Hello,
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:52:13AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 03:24:53PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>
> > They have some very interesting translators, and these should be easily
> > available.
> >
> > And easily doesn’t mean cvs :)
>
> $ cvs -
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:31:26AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 July 2010 09:48:13 Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > Aha, good to hear. This means that, unless nsmux opens bogus ports
> > (which I don't remember), the anonymous translators will actually go
> &
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 07:12:54AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 03:32:52PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > As far as I can remember, nsmux keeps the control ports of the started
> > translators, which, as I understand it, won't l
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 08:45:47AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> On Friday 09 July 2010 14:32:52 Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > Yes, you can kill them manually, but nsmux does nothing about dead
> > control ports; this memory leak you cannot avoid easily :-(
> > Nev
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 01:03:24PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> On Friday 09 July 2010 11:51:11 Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > Sadly, since I am very-very short on time now, nsmux is currently
> > stuck at almost the same capabilities as about a year ago: it works
> > for
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 11:34:08AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>
> Translators Being Under Development
[...]
> * nsmux
Sadly, since I am very-very short on time now, nsmux is currently
stuck at almost the same capabilities as about a year ago: it works
for the simplest file,,a,,b
Hello,
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:32:43PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 09:58:12AM +0200, Patrik Olsson wrote:
>
> > I mean I'm not able to (or have time to) fix any problems that may
> > arise if I use GNU/Hurd as a work station. It would just add another
> > la
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 11:42:25AM +0200, Patrik Olsson wrote:
>
> I have sent in the application now. :-) Am I supposed to check "make
> public", or are you able to see it regardless?
As far as I can tell, the ``Make public'' checkbox controls whether
your proposal is open to more people
Hello,
I want to teach nsmux to listen to the ``dead name'' notifications on
proxy ports pointing to anonymous translators. In less specific
words, I have a port to a translator and I want to know when the
translator has gone away.
Several people (Fredrik and Thomas) mentioned that I could achie
* eth-multiplexer/vdev.c (add_vdev): Assert the name of the
device to be created before copying it into the vdev
structure.
---
Hello,
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 06:03:46PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 10:25:47PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
Hello,
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 10:49:39PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> > >From 9408aa4f1896a89d9d354d7a0e0f75cbf0d2fc0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Sergiu Ivanov
> > Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:09:21 +0300
> > Subject: [PATCH] Handle the root node o
Hello,
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 06:57:30PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 04:26:55PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > However, taking into consideration the fact that antrik answers
> > E-mails pretty fast these days,
>
> Only those
Hello,
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 06:14:10PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 06:32:41PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 03:51:16PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> > wrote:
>
> > > These are probably all related. I
Hello,
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 06:12:14PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 09:01:50PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > As I said on the IRC, I planned to send you the repository by E-mail,
> > but the size of the (archived) version is 20MB, whic
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 09:29:07PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 05:09:40PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> >> Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> >>> - master_device = file_name_lookup (arg, 0, 0);
> >>> +
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 05:09:40PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
>
> Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > - master_device = file_name_lookup (arg, 0, 0);
> > + master_device = file_name_lookup (arg, O_READ | O_WRITE, 0);
>
> What happens if .MASTER file is read-only? Certa
* devnode/devnode.c (parse_opt): Open the pseudo-master
devide port with O_READ | O_WRITE flags to allow subsequent
device creation.
---
Hello,
Originally, devnode would open the pseudo-master device port with 0
flags. These flags are stored by eth-multiplexer in the peropen
structure and the su
* eth-multiplexer/device_impl.c (ds_device_open): Handle
the .MASTER node specially.
* eth-multiplexer/multiplexer.c (main): Create the .MASTER
node.
* eth-multiplexer/netfs_impl.c (master_node): New variable.
(lookup): Handle the lookups for .MASTER specially.
(netfs_add_dirents): Add the .MASTER
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:11:41PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> diff --git a/eth-multiplexer/vdev.c b/eth-multiplexer/vdev.c
> index dac9802..6fb88d0 100644
> --- a/eth-multiplexer/vdev.c
> +++ b/eth-multiplexer/vdev.c
> @@ -135,7 +135,10 @@ add_vdev (char *name, int s
Hello,
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 05:44:20PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > I see. The question, then, is whether it is appropriate to push the
> > whole Hurd source tree with Zheng's changes to the incubator, or
> > would it be better to have a
Hello,
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 05:52:48PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 08:52:33AM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> >> netfs_attempt_lookup locks this node and the node is unlocked by
> >> libnetfs, right? I forget a lot:-) So
Hello,
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 12:32:53PM +0530, Shakthi Kannan wrote:
> --- On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Sergiu Ivanov
> | Printing to a file is nothing fancy: the fprintf functions should
> | suffice.
> \--
>
> I would appreciate if I could see a working example. Wh
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 10:52:14PM +0530, Shakthi Kannan wrote:
> >From git://git.sv.gnu.org/hurd/hurd.git,
>
> On commit 908ba8441182f34a7b565a692ebb60e8af321d17, some
> clarifications on hurd/trans/hello.c:
>
> 1. version.h is located in /usr/include/hurd/version.h, so hello.c
> should
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 08:42:30AM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
>
> How do you get my Hurd.git repository? In it, is there history of
> eth-multiplexer development? I don't have any eth-multiplexer
> development history in my own git repository.
As I said on the IRC, I planned to send you the r
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 08:52:33AM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> netfs_attempt_lookup locks this node and the node is unlocked by
> libnetfs, right? I forget a lot:-) So why can the second lookup not
> wait until the first one finishes?
I've tried to remove the mutex unlocking code and it seems
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 03:51:16PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:25:51PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > but looking at the commit history in your hurd.git repository, I can
> > see that there are commits concerning the multiplex
Hello,
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 07:51:35PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> >
> > You can find the patches in the bug-hurd mailing list archives:
> >
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2009-08/msg00056.html
> > http://lists.gnu.
Hello,
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 07:40:12PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> Could you tell me why initializing node status here is perferred?
The multiplexer creates nodes on any demand, whether the client
intends to further use the node to create a (virtual) device or not.
This means that, for instance,
Hello,
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 07:37:21PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > @@ -85,6 +89,18 @@ new_node (struct lnode *ln, struct node **np)
> > struct node *
> > lookup (char *name)
> > {
> > + if (strcmp(name, MASTER_NODE_NAME) == 0)
Hello, Zheng
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 01:36:25AM -0500, Zheng Da wrote:
> antrik asked me to give your modifications on eth-multiplexer some
> review. could you please tell what the interface of eth-multiplexer is
> adopted and whether you have uploaded those changes in some online
> repository?
N
Hello,
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 07:21:01AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 07:20:08PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > antrik suggested that I put only the patch series to which he has
> > given a final acknowledge into the public repository.
&
* netfs.c (netfs_append_args) : Change the format
specification to ``%d''.
---
Hello,
This is a small patch fixing a typo in netfs_append_args.
Regards,
Sergiu
---
netfs.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/netfs.c b/netfs.c
index b3174fb..bb89c95 100644
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 03:07:59PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
>
> I'll just assume that the rest of the patch is also fine now, rather
> than looking through the whole thing again... I looked at it many times
> already; and even though it seems I'm spotting new things to nitpick
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 03:13:06PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> I think it's ready to go now :-)
Great :-) I've pushed the final version of the patch to the master
branch.
Regards,
Sergiu
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 12:37:31AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:20:45PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > Just to make sure: I can push the mount patch series (starting with
> > ``Add the --mount command line option'' to ``Add th
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 07:11:16AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 06:10:42PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 06:46:49AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> > wrote:
>
> > > While I do think that such ma
5AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > +assert (err == 0);
>
> Another thing you forgot to change in the second loop...
Yeah, sorry :-( Changed.
Regards,
scolobb
---
netfs.c | 81 --
1 files changed, 78 insertio
.
(setup_unionmount): New function.
* netfs.c (netfs_validate_stat): Start the mountee at the
first invocation.
---
Hello,
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 09:05:16PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:28:37AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > + /* Fetch the ef
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 06:47:45PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 01:27:37AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > I am again going to be absent from the meeting tomorrow, Dec 2. The
> > reason is that it looks as if I had got some wo
Hello,
I am again going to be absent from the meeting tomorrow, Dec 2. The
reason is that it looks as if I had got some work in mathematical
linguistics and parallel computing which might greatly help me in my
career, so my time is even scarcer now :-(
Please, do not consider me a heathen soul,
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 03:22:42PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 08:03:30PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:21:13AM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> > >
> > > I imagined that you'd only try to ad
6PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 09:58:31AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> > wrote:
>
> > > Well, did you actually test how it behaves with really readonly
> > > filesystems? (Most notably that it doesn't return an error status?)
> >
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:51:26PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
>
> I only glanced over the patch this time, no full review... Considering
> how often I looked at it already, I doubt that I would find anything new
> -- diminishing returns etc. :-)
>
> I'd say this patch series is
* mount.c (mountee_node): New variable.
(mountee_root): Likewise.
(mountee_started): Likewise.
(start_mountee): New function (based on node_set_translator
in nsmux).
(setup_unionmount): New function.
* mount.h (mountee_root): New variable.
(mountee_started): Likewise.
(start_mountee): New function.
Hello,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:21:13AM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:15:16AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:29:40PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> > >
> > > 1. Alice opens unionfs directory
>
Hello,
I'm really sorry, but it might happen that I won't be able to be
present at today's meeting either. I estimate the probability of my
presence at about 0.7.
In case I won't be able to make it for the meeting, I'm telling that
I've implemented (but not yet tested) the special O_NOTRANS
func
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:29:40PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
>
> > > As explained above this assumes that the file permissions tell the
> > > whole story. The main problem with my suggestion is that it might be
> > > too restrictive. For instance, if user Alice wants to add an ent
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 07:20:03PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 06:49:24PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:15:59PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
>
> No, I think you're confusing authenticatio
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:15:59PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:57:46AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 02:58:12PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 12:29:54PM +0100, olafbuddenh
1PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 01:03:29AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> > wrote:
>
> > > I think the initialization of "i" should be as close to the loop as
> > > possible -- after all, it's a loop counter...
> >
&g
is a valid directory.
---
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 12:58:02PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 07:08:45PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:13:09AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 02:58:12PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 12:29:54PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> >
> > > Well, obviously, O_READ permission on a directory is sufficient to
> > > create files in it.
> >
> > Ah, interesting...
> >
> > > I'm
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 08:27:46AM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 08:35:45AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > I'm very sorry that I didn't arrive at the yesterday's (Nov 11)
> > meeting. Unfourtunately, I fell sick and, alt
Hello,
I'm very sorry that I didn't arrive at the yesterday's (Nov 11)
meeting. Unfourtunately, I fell sick and, although I made several
attempts, I didn't manage to put my hands on the computer :-(
Regards,
scolobb
Hello,
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 12:13:30AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 05:15:30PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > Also, IIRC, the filter is expected to be run via symbolic links and
> > extract the name of the translator to be filtered ou
Hello,
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 01:28:53AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 04:27:12PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 07:11:16AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
>
> > > I think so. However, it's probably better
.
(setup_unionmount): New function.
* netfs.c (netfs_validate_stat): Start the mountee at the
first invocation.
---
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 06:37:54AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 07:15:09PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > AIUI, this title l
* netfs.c (netfs_attempt_sync): Sync every directory associated
with the supplied node.
(netfs_attempt_syncfs): Send file_syncfs to every directory
maintained by unionfs.
---
Hello,
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 06:56:41PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> That's why I think I agree with you
is a valid directory.
---
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:13:09AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 08:55:37PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 07:56:03PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at
009 at 11:44:59PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > @@ -282,7 +283,45 @@ error_t
> > netfs_attempt_sync (struct iouser *cred, struct node *np,
> > int wait)
> > {
> > - return EOPNOTSUPP;
> > + /* The error we are going to report ba
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 07:30:41AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 01:03:30PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > If one would like to keep *both* the information about the filesystems
> > *and* the ports to their root nodes in *a single
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 12:31:33PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 09:51:29PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 07:14:17PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>
> > > [...] named filter there. (Or perhaps f
Hello,
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 01:52:47PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 06:51:43PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > I do backups of sensitive information, but the reason I want a
> > snapshotting filesystem for is automated decision when to
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 07:19:47AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 06:13:47PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > I think I have an extra argument for the second way: if I create a
> > separate commit before the merge, things will stop worki
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 07:11:16AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 06:10:42PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 06:46:49AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> > wrote:
>
> > > While I do think that such ma
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 08:34:50AM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2009 20:31:46 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > > mmv?
> >
> > I'd rather agree with antrik here, because stuffing all these
> > operations in a single comma
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 05:23:13PM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 25. Oktober 2009 11:23:59 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> > That's a very bad thing to do. I hate all these mmv and other bullshit
>
> mmv?
I've heard of this for the first time, too :-)
google (``ma
Hello,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:44:20AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 03:06:21PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 03:25:39AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> > wrote:
>
> > > I still don't understan
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 07:22:28AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 03:38:08PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > I'd like to have a snapshotting filesystem at my box, because having
> > experienced the possibility to roll anything ba
Hello,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 07:14:17PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 07:48:36PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > A part of the namespace-based translator selection project is the
> > filter translator. It is currently here:
> > git://github.c
Hello,
A part of the namespace-based translator selection project is the
filter translator. It is currently here:
git://github.com/scolobb/filter.git . Is it a good idea to move this
translator into the incubator.git repository, just like nsmux has
been? If so, could you please tell me how to d
Hello,
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 06:51:57AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 02:35:14PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:40:29AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> > wrote:
>
> > > Of course, you also need to adapt
Hello,
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 06:46:49AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 06:21:13PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > According to what Thomas has suggested, I have pushed my code to the
> > unionfs git repository (git://git.sv.gnu.org/hurd
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 03:12:06PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 01:49:13PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > I was told that personal branches (like scolobb/fix-something) in the
> > unionfs.git repository are okay for publishing intermediate
Hello,
I was told that personal branches (like scolobb/fix-something) in the
unionfs.git repository are okay for publishing intermediate
(unrevised) changes. Are they still acceptable for incubator.git,
where there may possibly be several contributors? If so, should there
be a special branch nam
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 08:17:38AM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 11:00:41PM +0100, Davi Leal wrote:
> > Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> > > > Things may turn out differently and I may still arrive at the Hurd
> > > > meeting (being late), but I won't say this is m
Hello,
I'm afraid I won't be able to arrive at the Hurd meeting, because
there will be a meeting regarding scholarships in leading European
universities tomorrow, and I have a dream to manage to get into one of
such universities.
Things may turn out differently and I may still arrive at the Hurd
Hello,
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 11:50:13AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 05:39:34PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:20:01PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:56:01PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
&
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 09:16:38AM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 07:52:57PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 09:45:32PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>
> > > Can I also put it "on /"?
> > >
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 12:47:48AM +0530, Shakthi Kannan wrote:
> What works:
> 1. Ping to Internet from host system.
> 2. Pinging 172.16.0.1 (localhost) on host system.
> 3. Pinging 172.16.0.2 (on GNU Hurd), within qemu.
>
> What doesn't work;
> 4. Pinging 172.16.0.1 to 172.16.0.2.
>
> W
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 08:23:24AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> PS: I think that to get people to do some more testing, a few easy
> to use examples (and one complex and powerful example) would be
> efficient - especially if they directly contain the shell commands
> to use (copy p
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 09:45:32PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2009 18:36:34 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > > It reads nice, but I miss an info: How can I activate nsmux, so I
> > > can use the magic filenames?
> >
>
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 05:48:14PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2009 17:36:26 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > I wanted to simply add the contents of the README file to the page I
> > mention in the other E-mail, but having read it
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:18:44AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 29. September 2009 22:51:14 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > Great :-) I wasn't sure *this* README was useful.
>
> It describes what the translator does and how to use it, so it looks
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 09:30:15PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 29. September 2009 20:02:10 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > I haven't yet written any documentation about nsmux (save for a simple
> > README which resides nsmux directory) :-( I
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:16:29AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 02:15:44AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 06:07:01PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > > > > Also (if required) I can provide a short
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:16:15AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 11:45:34AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 04:04:19PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > > How did the GSoC work out?
>
> > antrik gave me
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:40:29AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 11:00:40PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > Firstly, as I have already said (and as you have already seen), the
> > majority of my commits to my nsmux reposi
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 09:04:33AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 22. September 2009 01:40:29 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> > > And the last question is about the integration itself: how exactly do
> > > I take my nsmux git repository and integrate it into the Hurd
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 09:30:15PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 29. September 2009 20:02:10 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > I haven't yet written any documentation about nsmux (save for a simple
> > README which resides nsmux directory) :-( I
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 08:37:25AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Montag, 28. September 2009 17:16:01 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > I have finally run into a period of time which I could dedicate to the
> > Hurd: I have just updated my own page, have put the i
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 08:27:37AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> By the way: Do we already have documentation about nsmux on the website?
I haven't yet written any documentation about nsmux (save for a simple
README which resides nsmux directory) :-( I'm not sure whether that
READ
Hello,
This has already been discussed on the IRC, and I will simply mention
the decision that has been taking in the live discussion.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 02:21:38AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 06:07:20AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
>
> >sett
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 12:52:28PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 6. September 2009 17:07:01 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > git://github.com/scolobb/unionmount.git
>
> I assume from the discussion, that this will not be the final
> destination.
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 12:28:09PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 8. September 2009 09:08:23 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > However, while writing this, it occurred to me that I could as well
> > put the short description into hurd-web/user/scolobb . After
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 05:26:54PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2009 16:54:54 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
>
> > I have a course of German at the University now, so I'll soon become a
> > true Hurd man :-) (since, apparently, a l
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 04:26:35PM +0200, Arne Bab. wrote:
> Sergiu wrote:
> > Hm, I wonder whether we could collect (or concoct) similar phrases
> > about the Hurd. It should be nice if we could...
>
> I put up my own quote in our wiki:
>
> "With the Hurd, users can change anything in
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 04:14:40PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2009 15:21:28 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > I usually prefer to have a long output than some witty short text
> > which contains some jokes, some vague indications, and no real
&
1 - 100 of 421 matches
Mail list logo
