Hello, On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 03:12:06PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 01:49:13PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > I was told that personal branches (like scolobb/fix-something) in the > > unionfs.git repository are okay for publishing intermediate > > (unrevised) changes. Are they still acceptable for incubator.git, > > where there may possibly be several contributors? > > Sure!
Great :-) > > If so, should there > > be a special branch naming convention for all contributors to follow? > > I'd say we can simply see how this evolves over time. Now, that doesn't > help you too much when just beginning to work on the branches in there, > so to make a useful suggestion: what about, e.g., using (a) > nsmux/scolobb-WHATEVER, or (b) scolobb/nsmux-WHATEVER, or (c) > nsmux-scolobb-WHATEVER (as suggested on > <http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/rules/source_repositories.html>). I > don't really care, so just pick one. I think I'll stick with scolobb/nsmux-WHATEVER for now; the choice is due to some vague sympathy, with no special logic behind. > If you need some help which one to pick ;-): > > $ echo "main(){printf(\"%c\n\",getpid()%3+'a');}" | gcc -w -x c - && > ./a.out LOL! :-D Regards, scolobb
