Re: Personal branches in incubator.git

Hello, On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 03:12:06PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 01:49:13PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > I was told that personal branches (like scolobb/fix-something) in the > > unionfs.git repository are okay for publishing intermediate > > (unrevised) changes

Re: Personal branches in incubator.git

Hello! On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 01:49:13PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > I was told that personal branches (like scolobb/fix-something) in the > unionfs.git repository are okay for publishing intermediate > (unrevised) changes. Are they still acceptable for incubator.git, > where there may possibl

Personal branches in incubator.git

Hello, I was told that personal branches (like scolobb/fix-something) in the unionfs.git repository are okay for publishing intermediate (unrevised) changes. Are they still acceptable for incubator.git, where there may possibly be several contributors? If so, should there be a special branch nam

Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM

Hello! On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 02:46:52AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > At last I've merged all my gnumach trees with the git repos, ending up > with pushing a bunch of fixes, notably a correct version of my patch to > support Xen domU with more than ~600MiB. I know that at least bach and > moz

[bug #27698] BPF, NPF, pfinet vs. package_header

Update of bug #27698 (project hurd): Summary:fix a bug in BPF => BPF, NPF, pfinet vs. package_header ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[bug #27698] fix a bug in BPF

URL: Summary: fix a bug in BPF Project: The GNU Hurd Submitted by: zhengda Submitted on: Wed 14 Oct 2009 10:07:33 AM CEST Category: None Priority: 5 - Normal

[patch #6851] fix a bug in BPF

Update of patch #6851 (project hurd): Status:Works For Me => Done Assigned to:None => zhengda ___ Reply to this item at: