Hello! On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 01:49:13PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > I was told that personal branches (like scolobb/fix-something) in the > unionfs.git repository are okay for publishing intermediate > (unrevised) changes. Are they still acceptable for incubator.git, > where there may possibly be several contributors?
Sure! For everyone's information: there are currently the following branches available (more to come): clisp, libchannel, nsmux. > If so, should there > be a special branch naming convention for all contributors to follow? I'd say we can simply see how this evolves over time. Now, that doesn't help you too much when just beginning to work on the branches in there, so to make a useful suggestion: what about, e.g., using (a) nsmux/scolobb-WHATEVER, or (b) scolobb/nsmux-WHATEVER, or (c) nsmux-scolobb-WHATEVER (as suggested on <http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/rules/source_repositories.html>). I don't really care, so just pick one. If you need some help which one to pick ;-): $ echo "main(){printf(\"%c\n\",getpid()%3+'a');}" | gcc -w -x c - && ./a.out Regards, Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
