Your message dated Thu, 2 Mar 2000 21:24:48 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#59471: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: weak assertions in libstore/rdwr.c]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
> PS
>
> Early results show that:
>
> new proc and new libports.so.0.2 fails
>
> Other permutations work
Thanks for doing that testing. This is the result I would have predicted
based on the failure modes we are seeing. I'd forgotten to mention the
details of what little investigati
PS
Early results show that:
new proc and new libports.so.0.2 fails
Other permutations work
Chris
Package: hurd
Version: 2000/03/01
An unattended bug reoprt on help-hurd.
Thanks,
Marcus
- Forwarded message from Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 10:52:29 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: weak assertions in li
Chris Lingard wrote:
> Have rebuilt the new Hurd with gcc-2.95.2. Removed all compiler
> optimisation, it made no difference, it still fails; exactly the same fault
> with proc. Will try something else tomorrow.
>
And tomorrow has come; and now I am totally confused. Messed up the new sour
Package: hurd
Version: N/A
Severity: normal
Hi,
As root:
# echo do not see > /tmp/secret
# chgrp marcus /tmp/secret
# chmod go-r /tmp/secret
Now /tmp/secret looks like this:
-rw--- root marcus tmp/secret
Now login as marcus, who belongs to group marcus and nothing else.
$ cat /tmp/secret
d
