On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Bruno Haible wrote:
Reuben Thomas wrote:
"Gnulib provides a module @samp{canonicalize-lgpl}"
since there's a canonicalize and a canonicalize-lgpl module, shouldn't it
just say "a module @samp{canonicalize}", and users can make the usual guess
that there might be an LGPL ve
Hi,
Reuben Thomas wrote:
> "Gnulib provides a module @samp{canonicalize-lgpl}"
>
> since there's a canonicalize and a canonicalize-lgpl module, shouldn't it
> just say "a module @samp{canonicalize}", and users can make the usual guess
> that there might be an LGPL version?
The 'canonicalize' m
"Gnulib provides a module @samp{canonicalize-lgpl}"
since there's a canonicalize and a canonicalize-lgpl module, shouldn't it
just say "a module @samp{canonicalize}", and users can make the usual guess
that there might be an LGPL version?
--
http://rrt.sc3d.org/ | romantic, n. one who puts i
