Hi,
Reuben Thomas wrote:
> "Gnulib provides a module @samp{canonicalize-lgpl}"
>
> since there's a canonicalize and a canonicalize-lgpl module, shouldn't it
> just say "a module @samp{canonicalize}", and users can make the usual guess
> that there might be an LGPL version?The 'canonicalize' module is farther away from the realpath() function: Different API, and not usable in libraries due to xalloc(). I think mentioning 'canonicalize-lgpl' is therefore more adequate here. Bruno
