On 12/29/2009 01:12 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to ctrn3e8 on 12/29/2009 11:58 AM:
Re: touch --ref file1 -m file2 or touch -m file1 --ref file2
Does not work on ntfs-3g. See attached
Thanks. That confirmed half of w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Bruno Haible on 12/24/2009 1:46 PM:
> Eric Blake wrote:
>> Any objections to a patch that
>> makes replacement of these headers unconditional, so that
>> GNULIB_POSIXCHECK will work better?
>>
>
> modules/spawn and modules/sys_times will
Eric Blake writes:
> For that matter, the following test modules can probably omit a 'Licenses:'
> line; any objections to a patch along those lines?
No objections from me on modules that I maintain.
--
Ben Pfaff
http://benpfaff.org
On Tuesday 29 December 2009 18:05:11 Eric Blake wrote:
> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko gmail.com> writes:
> > It's inconsistent with the rest of this file.
>
> That may be true, but it's not enough to worry about.
i dont personally care one way or the other, but trunk gcc has sometimes
Eric Blake byu.net> writes:
> but I'm inclined to not apply it.
>
> > It's inconsistent with the rest of this file.
>
> That may be true, but it's not enough to worry about.
Clarification - I'm not inclined to apply it, because this is identical to
upstream glibc. If you can convince Uli to
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko gmail.com> writes:
> +#if (defined MB_CUR_MAX && HAVE_LOCALE_H && HAVE_WCTYPE_H &&
HAVE_ISWCTYPE && HAVE_WCSCOLL) || defined (_LIBC)
Redundant parenthesis. If we were to apply this, it should be:
defined _LIBC
but I'm inclined to not apply it.
> It's in
Simon Josefsson josefsson.org> writes:
> > files that suffer from the same fate, although I would like feedback before
> > changing any of their licenses.
> >
>
> I recognize some of my files in there, and using GPLv3+ for them should
> be fine.
Here's what I'll push, then. My sed script for
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> "Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko" writes:
>
>
>> === modified file 'gnulib/regex_internal.h'
>> --- gnulib/regex_internal.h2009-12-27 15:37:18 +
>> +++ gnulib/regex_internal.h2009-12-29 22:32:31 +
>> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
>> # define SIZE_MAX ((size_t
"Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko" writes:
> === modified file 'gnulib/regex_internal.h'
> --- gnulib/regex_internal.h2009-12-27 15:37:18 +
> +++ gnulib/regex_internal.h2009-12-29 22:32:31 +
> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
> # define SIZE_MAX ((size_t) -1)
> #endif
>
> -#if (defined
=== modified file 'gnulib/regex_internal.h'
--- gnulib/regex_internal.h2009-12-27 15:37:18 +
+++ gnulib/regex_internal.h2009-12-29 22:32:31 +
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
# define SIZE_MAX ((size_t) -1)
#endif
-#if (defined MB_CUR_MAX && HAVE_LOCALE_H && HAVE_WCTYPE_H &&
HAVE_ISWCTYPE && H
Eric Blake byu.net> writes:
> Oh, I finally see it now. There are only 84 bytes being translated; pre-
patch,
> the invocation was "tr [85] [84]", post-patch it is "tr [84] [84]". So the
> problem was not with '-' (although that can potentially be problematic in its
> own right), but in the
The test-localename test crashes for me:
/bin/sh: line 5: 15913 Segmentation fault ${dir}$tst
FAIL: test-localename
Gdb says:
(gdb) r
Starting program: /home/jas/src/gnulib/m/gltests/test-localename
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
strcmp () at ../sysdeps/i386/i686/str
This
rm -rf m && ./gnulib-tool --create-testdir --dir m --with-tests localename; cd
m && ./configure --host=i586-mingw32msvc --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu && make check
yields
i586-mingw32msvc-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I.. -I./.. -I../gllib
-I./../gllib -g -O2 -MT test-localename.o -MD -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to ctrn3e8 on 12/29/2009 11:58 AM:
> Re: touch --ref file1 -m file2 or touch -m file1 --ref file2
> Does not work on ntfs-3g. See attached
Thanks. That confirmed half of what I was worried about.
> valid/UTIME_NOW , make -k stuff
> I d
On 12/28/2009 07:10 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to ctrn3e8 on 12/20/2009 10:04 PM:
touch -m no longer seems to modify the file modification date. Archlinux,
coreutils-8.2 (package coreutils-8.2-1-i686). Works if use coreutils-7.6.
Eric Blake writes:
> I noticed several of my recently written tests suffered from a copy-and-paste
> license error (they stated GPLv2+, even though unit tests are generally v3+
> because they are not linked into the final product). Here are the remaining
> files that suffer from the same fate
Ralf Wildenhues gmx.de> writes:
> > The creation of a binary file from within javacomp.m4 created a wrong file
> > on Solaris, because Solaris 'tr' (all of /usr/bin/tr, /usr/xpg4/bin/tr,
> > /usr/xpg6/bin/tr) behave differently than GNU 'tr' in a particular case.
>
> I've tried to read the patch
Eric Blake byu.net> writes:
> I noticed several of my recently written tests suffered from a copy-and-paste
> license error (they stated GPLv2+, even though unit tests are generally v3+
> because they are not linked into the final product). Here are the remaining
> files that suffer from the
Hello Bruno, and hope y'all have had nice holidays,
* Bruno Haible wrote on Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 04:26:35PM CET:
> The creation of a binary file from within javacomp.m4 created a wrong file
> on Solaris, because Solaris 'tr' (all of /usr/bin/tr, /usr/xpg4/bin/tr,
> /usr/xpg6/bin/tr) behave differe
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Eric Blake wrote:
>> Jim Meyering meyering.net> writes:
>>
>>> Thanks for the feedback.
>>> I've gone ahead and pushed the result as a single commit for 2009.
>>
>> I think we need to revert a couple of files, and figure out why they weren't
>> picked up in your exemption fil
Jim Meyering meyering.net> writes:
> > doc/gpl-3.0.texi|2 +-
> > doc/lgpl-3.0.texi |2 +-
>
> Good catch.
>
> That happened because those two files are not listed in config/srclist.txt:
>
> $GNUWWWLICENSES/lgpl-3.0.txtdoc/COPYING.LESSERv3
Eric Blake byu.net> writes:
> I think we need to revert a couple of files, and figure out why they weren't
> picked up in your exemption file (so that when you repeat the exercise in
three
> more days for 2010, we don't repeat the mistake):
>
> doc/gpl-3.0.texi|2 +-
> doc/lg
Eric Blake wrote:
> Jim Meyering meyering.net> writes:
>
>> Thanks for the feedback.
>> I've gone ahead and pushed the result as a single commit for 2009.
>
> I think we need to revert a couple of files, and figure out why they weren't
> picked up in your exemption file (so that when you repeat th
Jim Meyering meyering.net> writes:
> Thanks for the feedback.
> I've gone ahead and pushed the result as a single commit for 2009.
I think we need to revert a couple of files, and figure out why they weren't
picked up in your exemption file (so that when you repeat the exercise in three
more d
Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Jim Meyering on 12/28/2009 8:02 AM:
>> I'm going to add 2009 to most copyright year lists
>> that have not yet been updated this year.
>>
>> I'm doing it in several separate commits, but will probably squash
>> these all into a single commit, in order to minimize lo
I noticed several of my recently written tests suffered from a copy-and-paste
license error (they stated GPLv2+, even though unit tests are generally v3+
because they are not linked into the final product). Here are the remaining
files that suffer from the same fate, although I would like feedb
Eric Blake writes:
> According to Simon Josefsson on 12/28/2009 11:51 PM:
>> This patch looks a bit cleaner, it moves the system call into the
>> function actually responsible for creating the same files. And it also
>> fixes lstat self-tests.
>
> On the one hand, you are correct that it is nice
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Simon Josefsson on 12/28/2009 11:51 PM:
> This patch looks a bit cleaner, it moves the system call into the
> function actually responsible for creating the same files. And it also
> fixes lstat self-tests.
On the one hand, you are corre
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Simon Josefsson writes:
...
>> http://autobuild.josefsson.org/gnulib/log-200912271011859192000.txt
>>
>> Any ideas?
>
> The reason was that selinux/selinux.h was built before
> unused-parameters.h, so the unused-parameters.h file that was inserted
> into selinux/selinux.h
29 matches
Mail list logo
