Eric Blake wrote: > According to Jim Meyering on 12/28/2009 8:02 AM: >> I'm going to add 2009 to most copyright year lists >> that have not yet been updated this year. >> >> I'm doing it in several separate commits, but will probably squash >> these all into a single commit, in order to minimize log history pollution. >> In fact, I'm thinking of combining yet another change: the one from Jan 1 >> that adds 2010 to each Copyright line. In that case, of course I'd >> push the result only after the new year. Would anyone prefer to keep >> such administrative changes as separate commits? > > I'm kind of thinking that two commits (one for all 2009 changes, squashed > together, and one for the rollover to 2010) will be slightly nicer in the > repository history. But I'm certainly in favor of your proposed outline > of changes.
Thanks for the feedback. I've gone ahead and pushed the result as a single commit for 2009.
