I was told that Red Hat has a blanket agreement with the FSF for
copyright assignment. Whatever I did for this module, I did during work
hours, so copyright belongs to Red Hat. I think that is also true for
Dan (cc'd him so he can confirm that explicitly)
Can somebody from the
Hi,
Reuben Thomas wrote:
> "Gnulib provides a module @samp{canonicalize-lgpl}"
>
> since there's a canonicalize and a canonicalize-lgpl module, shouldn't it
> just say "a module @samp{canonicalize}", and users can make the usual guess
> that there might be an LGPL version?
The 'canonicalize' m
"Gnulib provides a module @samp{canonicalize-lgpl}"
since there's a canonicalize and a canonicalize-lgpl module, shouldn't it
just say "a module @samp{canonicalize}", and users can make the usual guess
that there might be an LGPL version?
--
http://rrt.sc3d.org/ | romantic, n. one who puts i
