https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22233
--- Comment #4 from Peter Smith ---
Thanks for the comment, I'll leave the patch as it is for now as I think it
helps to have the view_offset added in each case. Happy to remove it if others
prefer though.
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22431
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=06bcf5416feae129e239476ab1408e038bba171d
commit 06bcf5416feae129e239476ab1408
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22431
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|amodra at gmail dot com|
Summary|ld (binutils-
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
--- Comment #20 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #19)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #18)
> > (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #17)
> > > This is a tentative patch which could replace the bad one. Only tested on
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
--- Comment #21 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #20)
> MASM is totally irrelevant here.
This is your opinion, which I don't share. Is this formally written down
anywhere? Plus the presence of a MASM syntax expression pa
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
--- Comment #22 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #21)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #20)
> > MASM is totally irrelevant here.
>
> This is your opinion, which I don't share. Is this formally written down
> anywhere?
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
--- Comment #23 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #22)
> The MASM syntax expression parser supports -masm=intel.
How that? The compiler doesn't emit expressions, it does all the calculations
and emits plain numbers. Are y
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
--- Comment #24 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #23)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #22)
> > The MASM syntax expression parser supports -masm=intel.
>
> How that? The compiler doesn't emit expressions, it does all
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
--- Comment #25 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #24)
> Please don't do that.
Why would I not? As indicated, you didn't obtain maintainer approval. In fact
I've just checked the mailing list archives - you didn't even th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22266
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22266
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(gdb) r
Starting program:
/export/build/gnu/binutils-gold/build-i686-linux/gold/testsuite/pr22266
Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0x00164410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00164410 in __kerne
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22266
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22266
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
> Created attachment 10589 [details]
> A testcase
>
> [hjl@gnu-6 tmp]$ ld.bfd -m elf_i386 -r -T
> /export/gnu/import/git/sources/binutils-gdb/gold/testsuite/pr22266_script.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22266
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
Symbol table is wrong:
--- 2 2017-11-14 08:54:05.933477729 -0800
+++ 1 2017-11-14 08:54:23.381514511 -0800
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ Symbol table '.symtab' contains 10 entri
5: 0 SECTION LOCAL D
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22266
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
The content of .data.rel.ro section is also wrong.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-bin
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22266
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
This
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22266
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|2.28|2.30 (HEAD)
--
You are receiving this mail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22266
--- Comment #12 from James Clarke ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9)
> Symbol table is wrong:
>
> --- 2 2017-11-14 08:54:05.933477729 -0800
> +++ 1 2017-11-14 08:54:23.381514511 -0800
> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ Symbol table '.symtab' contains
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22441
Bug ID: 22441
Summary: x86-64: wrong relocation type used for 32-bit
index-with-no-base addressing
Product: binutils
Version: 2.30 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
19 matches
Mail list logo
