https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
--- Comment #20 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #19) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #18) > > (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #17) > > > This is a tentative patch which could replace the bad one. Only tested on > > > 2.29.1 so far. > > > > Does GCC behave the same with and without -asm=intel with your change? > > As long as there's only a single segment override - of course. Obviously > multiple (redundant) segment overrides would then be accepted again, as they > should be. But as long as gcc cares, it should emit anything like that. No, they should not by gas. MASM is totally irrelevant here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
