https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
--- Comment #22 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #21) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #20) > > MASM is totally irrelevant here. > > This is your opinion, which I don't share. Is this formally written down > anywhere? Plus the presence of a MASM syntax expression parser pretty > clearly contradicts this statement of yours. As I said, the main purpose of gas is to serve GCC. The MASM syntax expression parser supports -masm=intel. But we don't pursue MASM compatibility by making gas itself inconsistent. At very minimum, a warning should be issued by default, which can be controlled by -moperand-check=[none|error|warning] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
