--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-09-28 09:46
---
Hi Niki,
Great - I have checked the patch in along with these changelog entries.
Cheers
Nick
bfd/ChangeLog
PR 10478
* elf.c (bfd_section_from_shdr): Allow SHN_BEFORE and SHN_AFTER
sec
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-28
09:45 ---
Subject: Bug 10478
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-09-28 09:45:33
Modified files:
bfd: ChangeLog elf.c elfcode.h
bi
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-09-26
00:35 ---
looks very good now:
===
$ uname -a
SunOS x4150-1.dev.nlatlu.wipro.com 5.10 Generic_139556-08 i86pc i386 i86pc
Solaris
$ size /usr/lib/libC.so.*
textdata bss dec hex filename
636295
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-09-25 10:32
---
Hi Niki,
OK, please try out the newly uploaded patch (pr10478.x86.patch). This should
be applied on top of the previously patched sources, if you are using them, or
just straight to the current mainline binutil
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-09-25 10:31
---
Created an attachment (id=4229)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4229&action=view)
Update previous patch to work with x86 binaries
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10478
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-09-21
15:52 ---
any idea related to this? it should be as easy to fix as for solaris/sparc ...
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10478
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-09-17
19:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=4202)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4202&action=view)
sol10/x86 not okay
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10478
--- You are recei
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-09-17
19:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=4201)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4201&action=view)
sol10/x86 okay
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10478
--- You are receiving
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-09-17
19:23 ---
same issue on i386-pc-solaris2.10!!!
will upload libC.so.3 and libCso.5 from solaris10/x86.
===
$ uname -a
SunOS x4150-1 5.10 Generic_139556-08 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
$ size /usr/lib/libC.so.*
textd
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-09
15:06 ---
Subject: Bug 10478
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Branch: binutils-2_20-branch
Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-09-09 15:05:52
Modified files:
bfd:
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-09
15:04 ---
Subject: Bug 10478
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-09-09 15:03:54
Modified files:
bfd: ChangeLog elf.c elfcode.h
bi
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-09-09 14:57
---
Hi Niki,
Ok, I will commit the patch to the mainline sources and the new
about-to-be-released 2.20 branch.
I'll close the PR for now. If it turns out that there are issues linking
against libraries which use
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-09-09 14:55
---
Created an attachment (id=4184)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4184&action=view)
same as previous patch
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10478
--- You are receivin
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-09-09
14:49 ---
oh! just learned about 2.20.51.0.1 to which your patch applies smoothly.
... and, yes, your patch fixes all issues. thank you!
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10478
--- You are re
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-09-09
12:34 ---
nick, can you provide a patchfile against 2.19.51.0.14? i get failures using the
file provided:
===
patching file bfd/elf.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1537 (offset 23 lines).
patching file bfd/elfcode.h
Hunk #1 FA
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-09-09 11:50
---
Hi Niki,
Ian's explanation was all that I needed.
Please try out the uploaded patch. It appears to work for the libC.so.5 file
you supplied, at least as far as the informational binutils programs go (size,
o
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-09-09 11:47
---
Created an attachment (id=4182)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4182&action=view)
Accept sparc binaries with a sh_link field set to SHN_BEFORE or SHN_AFTER
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzi
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-09-09
07:43 ---
shall i upload more unrecognized files for reference?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10478
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or
--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2009-09-09 03:16 ---
If SHF_LINK_ORDER is set in the flags field, then the sh_link field is permitted
to contain the special values SHN_BEFORE (65280) and SHN_AFTER (65281).
SHN_BEFORE means that this section should come before all other s
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-09-08
14:50 ---
the following files can't be used by binutils:
===
find /usr/sfw/lib /usr/lib -type f | grep "\.so\." | while read i; do size $i
1>/dev/null 2>&1 || echo $i; done
/usr/sfw/lib/libMagick++.so.5.0.47
/usr/sfw/
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-09-08 13:49
---
Hi Niki,
> is this going to be fixed in binutils?
If you can find an explanation for the why the .exception_ranges section has an
invalid sh_link value of 65280 then we will fix the binutils. But at the
moment
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-09-08
12:53 ---
is this going to be fixed in binutils? it is definitely a big impact on solaris,
as some programs just do not compile (using gcc/binutils). libC.so.5 is just one
example of such a library.
--
http://sour
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2009-08-05
00:25 ---
This is the reason for the failure:
[13] .exception_ranges PROGBITS000412ec 0412ec 007aac 00 A 65280
0 4
When reading an ELF file BFD does some basic sanity checks in elf_object_p.
Why does
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-08-04
13:22 ---
by the way:
===
$ /opt/binutils/2.18.50.0.4/bin/size /usr/lib/libC.so.*
textdata bss dec hex filename
7224627071049 76002 128e2 /usr/lib/libC.so.3
313309 21201 59788 39
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-08-04
11:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=4112)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4112&action=view)
file format not recognized
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10478
--- You a
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-08-04
11:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=4111)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4111&action=view)
file recognized okay
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10478
--- You are rec
26 matches
Mail list logo
