------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-09-08 13:49 ------- Hi Niki,
> is this going to be fixed in binutils? If you can find an explanation for the why the .exception_ranges section has an invalid sh_link value of 65280 then we will fix the binutils. But at the moment the tools are quite reasonably rejecting the file as not being a valid sparc-elf binary, because of this discrepancy. My guess is that Solaris is using the sh_link field for some non-standard purpose. But what purpose ? Cheers Nick -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10478 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils