------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com  2009-09-08 13:49 
-------
Hi Niki,

> is this going to be fixed in binutils?

If you can find an explanation for the why the .exception_ranges section has an
 invalid sh_link value of 65280 then we will fix the binutils.  But at the
moment the tools are quite reasonably rejecting the file as not being a valid
sparc-elf binary, because of this discrepancy.

My guess is that Solaris is using the sh_link field for some non-standard
purpose.  But what purpose ?

Cheers
  Nick


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10478

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

Reply via email to