--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-06-08
21:12 ---
Fixed by my patch, which has already been checked in.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-06-08
20:00 ---
Richard, is my solution (a warning) acceptable? Or do you have another
suggestion?
It might be possible to do better, either add more code to get the unwind info
correct in this case, or add code to
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-06-08
20:09 ---
I should point out that while my patch does get the unwind info correct for the
.text section (assuming no additional code in .text after the section switch),
the .text.unlikely section unwind info is still
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-06-08
19:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=511)
--> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=511&action=view)
Warn for section switch that corrupts unwind info.
This is my fix for the problem. It d
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-06-08
18:48 ---
Nick's patch avoids the assembler core dump, but results in corrupted unwind
info. IMHO, this is worse, since it converted an obvious error into a silent
one.
I'm thinking the assembler sho
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-05-12
20:38 ---
Subject: Re: New: Extension to BFD and addr2line to
print inlining chain
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 12:10, fnf at specifixinc dot com wrote:
> The patch (which I'll attach separately) allows a
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-03-29
02:19 ---
HJ checked in his patch to fix this.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-03-28
22:26 ---
Subject: Re: gas should avoid F-unit NOPs (and B-unit
probably, too)
On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 13:48, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> This is an updated patch. I documented the change and modif
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-03-28
21:36 ---
Subject: Re: gas should avoid F-unit NOPs (and B-unit
probably, too)
On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 13:03, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> This patch adds "-mtune=[itanium1|itanium2]". I will
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-03-25
21:07 ---
Subject: Re: gas should avoid F-unit NOPs (and B-unit
probably, too)
On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 09:18, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> I think we should add -mcpu=[itanium1|itanium2] and make itanium2
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-03-25
02:46 ---
Subject: Re: gas should avoid F-unit NOPs (and B-unit
probably, too)
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 18:22, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-03-25
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-03-25
01:13 ---
The patch looks OK to me, but I expect it will break the IA-64 gas testsuite,
which means we need patches for that also. I haven't tried writing those
patches yet.
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bug
12 matches
Mail list logo
