------- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-06-08 20:00 ------- Richard, is my solution (a warning) acceptable? Or do you have another suggestion?
It might be possible to do better, either add more code to get the unwind info correct in this case, or add code to determine when the warning is not necessary (as in this case), but I'm not motivated to try either, as I don't believe this assembler construct should be valid in the first place. -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=994 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
