[Bug gold/20642] internal error in get_section_contents, at icf.cc:467 with --icf=safe

2017-06-08 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20642 --- Comment #6 from Sriraman Tallam --- On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 12:40 PM, nicolas.capens at gmail dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20642 > > --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Capens --- > We worked around this by usi

[Bug gold/20642] internal error in get_section_contents, at icf.cc:467 with --icf=safe

2017-06-05 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20642 --- Comment #4 from Sriraman Tallam --- I guess I dropped the ball on this, been unable to get to it, sorry. Let me take a look today. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _

[Bug gold/20642] internal error in get_section_contents, at icf.cc:467 with --icf=safe

2016-09-27 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20642 Sriraman Tallam changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tmsriram at google dot com

[Bug ld/19161] GNU ld wrongly garbage collects section referenced via __start_SECTIONNAME

2015-10-22 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19161 Sriraman Tallam changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tmsriram at google dot com

[Bug ld/18801] PIE binary with STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol and TEXTREL segfaults on x86_64

2015-08-13 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18801 --- Comment #16 from Sriraman Tallam --- On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 7:22 AM, ppluzhnikov at google dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18801 > > --- Comment #15 from Paul Pluzhnikov --- >> FIXED > > What about Gold?

[Bug ld/18801] PIE binary with STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol and TEXTREL segfaults on x86_64

2015-08-12 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18801 --- Comment #10 from Sriraman Tallam --- On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:08 PM, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18801 > > --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- > Linker should refuse to generate binar

[Bug ld/12694] Local IFUNC symbol causes TEXTREL

2015-08-10 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
, ||tmsriram at google dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gold/18745] New: --start-lib --end-lib picks a weak symbol definition ahead of a strong symbol definition

2015-07-30 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com Reporter: tmsriram at google dot com CC: ian at airs dot com Target Milestone: --- Is this a bug? foo.cc #include __attribute__((weak)) int foo

[Bug gold/18703] Symbol version and Version script incompatibility with BFD ld

2015-07-22 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703 --- Comment #17 from Sriraman Tallam --- On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:24 AM, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703 > > --- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu --- > (In reply to Sriraman Tallam from com

[Bug gold/18703] Symbol version and Version script incompatibility with BFD ld

2015-07-22 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703 --- Comment #15 from Sriraman Tallam --- On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 5:35 PM, ccoutant at gmail dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703 > > --- Comment #6 from Cary Coutant --- >>Another usage of the '.symver'

[Bug gold/18703] Symbol version and Version script incompatibility with BFD ld

2015-07-21 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
is affects building libgcc_s.so in trunk, but you haven't > said what is actually failing. > > -cary > > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 4:51 PM, tmsriram at google dot com > wrote: >> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703 >> >> --- Comment #2 fro

[Bug gold/18703] Symbol version and Version script incompatibility with BFD ld

2015-07-21 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703 --- Comment #2 from Sriraman Tallam --- On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:03 AM, ccoutant at gmail dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703 > > --- Comment #1 from Cary Coutant --- > You're looking at the linker symbol

[Bug gold/18703] Symbol version and Version script incompatibility with BFD ld

2015-07-21 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703 Sriraman Tallam changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ccoutant at gmail dot com -- You a

[Bug gold/18703] Symbol version and Version script incompatibility with BFD ld

2015-07-21 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703 Sriraman Tallam changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com -- You

[Bug gold/18703] New: Symbol version and Version script incompatibility with BFD ld

2015-07-21 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
Priority: P2 Component: gold Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com Reporter: tmsriram at google dot com CC: ian at airs dot com, iant at google dot com, ppluzhnikov at google dot com, saugustine at google dot com Target

[Bug gold/18440] ICF depends on the section name to detect constructors and destructors

2015-05-22 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18440 --- Comment #3 from Sriraman Tallam --- On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:16 AM, rafael.espindola at gmail dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18440 > > --- Comment #2 from Rafael Ávila de Espíndola com> --- >> > This un

[Bug gold/18440] ICF depends on the section name to detect constructors and destructors

2015-05-20 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com > Reporter: rafael.espindola at gmail dot com > CC: ian at airs dot com, tmsriram at google dot com > Target Milestone: --- > > ICF has the following logic > > // With --icf=safe, check if the mangled funct

[Bug gold/17704] icf doesn't respect section alignment

2014-12-12 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17704 Sriraman Tallam changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tmsriram at google dot com

[Bug gold/16870] New: Gold internal error with -fpie and -mcmodel=large

2014-04-23 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
Component: gold Assignee: ian at airs dot com Reporter: tmsriram at google dot com CC: ccoutant at google dot com This code: foo.cc -- extern int foo; extern int bar(); int main () { return foo + bar(); } compiled with: gcc-4_9_g++ foo.cc -fpie

[Bug gold/14262] icf corrupts unwind info and makes exception throwing to abort

2012-07-09 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14262 --- Comment #2 from Sriraman Tallam 2012-07-10 00:26:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > any chance that this problem that some attention soon? > We have code that benefits from icf and it is a pity we cannot use it together > with lto I d

[Bug gold/13364] ICF may not be as thorough as one would expect

2011-10-31 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13364 --- Comment #1 from Sriraman Tallam 2011-10-31 17:50:37 UTC --- Hi Mike, Can you give me instructions to build this or better, a reduced test case, for me to debug. Thanks, -Sri. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/user

[Bug gold/13314] ICF clashes with section ordering

2011-10-25 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13314 --- Comment #1 from Sriraman Tallam 2011-10-26 00:08:16 UTC --- This was pointed out earlier by somebody but it is not really clear to me what the fix must be for this. In the same example, if I have the order : .text.baz .text.foo .text.bak

[Bug gold/12919] icf fails to fold one of the component of std::sort

2011-09-22 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12919 --- Comment #10 from Sriraman Tallam 2011-09-22 17:48:57 UTC --- On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:29 AM, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch wrote: > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12919 > > --- Comment #9 from Vincenzo Innocente > 2

[Bug gold/12919] icf fails to fold one of the component of std::sort

2011-09-21 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12919 --- Comment #7 from Sriraman Tallam 2011-09-21 21:25:45 UTC --- The std namespace is marked explicity with default visibility. So, these symbols are exported no matter what. If you do hide those symbols the folding will work. -- Configure bu

[Bug gold/12919] icf fails to fold one of the component of std::sort

2011-09-21 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12919 --- Comment #4 from Sriraman Tallam 2011-09-21 18:58:03 UTC --- It is about pre-emptible symbols and libstdcxx makes namespace std as visiblity default. It is working as intended. Let me explain with an example first. If you have two functio

[Bug gold/12919] icf fails to fold one of the component of std::sort

2011-09-21 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12919 Sriraman Tallam changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iant at google dot com --- Comment #

[Bug gold/12919] icf fails to fold one of the component of std::sort

2011-09-21 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12919 --- Comment #2 from Sriraman Tallam 2011-09-21 16:52:53 UTC --- Sorry, I did not get a chance to look at this yet. I will take a look at it this week. Thanks, -Sri. On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 9:50 AM, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch wrote: >

[Bug gold/12919] icf fails to fold one of the component of std::sort

2011-06-22 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12919 Sriraman Tallam changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|ian at airs dot com |tmsriram at google dot com

[Bug gold/12388] icf_test.sh and icf_safe_test.sh fail

2011-01-11 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12388 --- Comment #1 from Sriraman Tallam 2011-01-12 02:04:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > Created attachment 5190 [details] > testcase > > on x86_64-suse-linux I see > > FAIL: icf_test.sh > PASS: icf_keep_unique_test.sh > FAIL: icf_safe_tes

[Bug gold/11658] final_layout.sh failed

2010-06-03 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
. Patches: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gold/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.570&r2=1.571 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gold/output.cc.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.127&r2=1.128 --- Additional Comments From tmsriram at google dot com 2010-06-03 18:03 --

[Bug gold/11658] final_layout.sh failed

2010-06-02 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|ian at airs dot com |tmsriram at google dot com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org

[Bug binutils/11133] New: Static linking with gc-sections deletes __libc_atexit causing problems with stdio buffer flush to file.

2010-01-04 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
flush to file. Product: binutils Version: 2.19 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: tmsriram at google dot com CC: