https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18440
--- Comment #3 from Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram at google dot com> --- On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:16 AM, rafael.espindola at gmail dot com <sourceware-bugzi...@sourceware.org> wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18440 > > --- Comment #2 from Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail dot > com> --- >> > This unfortunately doesn't work if the compiler avoids producing the long >> > section names (as llvm now can). >> >> Can we use the symbol name directly? > > That would be nice. Which is why I asked: > >> > Is there a convenient pass over the symbols that could be used for this >> > instead? > > Looks like there is, could we use the walk done from > Symbol_table::add_from_relob to check if a section has just a constructor in > it? We already use that walk to mark symbols as gc roots. I agree, just like gc_mark_symbol, you could call mark_ctor_or_dtor(sym). Sri > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
