https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18440
--- Comment #1 from Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram at google dot com> --- On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:27 PM, rafael.espindola at gmail dot com <sourceware-bugzi...@sourceware.org> wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18440 > > Bug ID: 18440 > Summary: ICF depends on the section name to detect constructors > and destructors > Product: binutils > Version: unspecified > Status: NEW > Severity: normal > Priority: P2 > Component: gold > Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com > Reporter: rafael.espindola at gmail dot com > CC: ian at airs dot com, tmsriram at google dot com > Target Milestone: --- > > ICF has the following logic > > // With --icf=safe, check if the mangled function name is a ctor > // or a dtor. The mangled function name can be obtained from the > // section name by stripping the section prefix. > if (parameters->options().icf_safe_folding() > && !is_function_ctor_or_dtor(section_name) > && (!target.can_check_for_function_pointers() > || section_has_function_pointers(*p, i))) > { > continue; > } > > This unfortunately doesn't work if the compiler avoids producing the long > section names (as llvm now can). Can we use the symbol name directly? > > Is there a convenient pass over the symbols that could be used for this > instead? > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
