[Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores

2009-09-15 Thread george dot tovrea at baesystems dot com
--- Additional Comments From george dot tovrea at baesystems dot com 2009-09-15 15:32 --- Subject: RE: GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores More info: The following is a snippet of the code where the patch was applied and I added debug statements. I added the output (see

[Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores

2009-09-15 Thread george dot tovrea at baesystems dot com
--- Additional Comments From george dot tovrea at baesystems dot com 2009-09-15 15:12 --- Subject: RE: GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores I tried the patch without success but the problem does appear to be in that area of the code. I inserted some debug statements and found

[Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores

2009-09-14 Thread george dot tovrea at baesystems dot com
--- Additional Comments From george dot tovrea at baesystems dot com 2009-09-14 20:11 --- Subject: RE: GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores Thanks for the patch. I'll give it a try. The internet-Nazis on my end blocked simple.o for some reason (even though they didn'

[Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores

2009-09-14 Thread george dot tovrea at baesystems dot com
--- Additional Comments From george dot tovrea at baesystems dot com 2009-09-14 13:33 --- Subject: RE: GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores Not sure why you need simple.o since it is "simple" to compile, but it and xerces 28 are attached. If you don't get xer

[Bug ld/10629] New: GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores

2009-09-11 Thread george dot tovrea at baesystems dot com
rt1text.s":177, 0x10008d28] -- Summary: GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores Product: binutils Version: 2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot r