------- Additional Comments From george dot tovrea at baesystems dot com 2009-09-15 15:12 ------- Subject: RE: GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores
I tried the patch without success but the problem does appear to be in that area of the code. I inserted some debug statements and found only one was hit before the core. I am trying to narrow it down and I'll keep you up to date on what I find. Regards, Bill T. -----Original Message----- From: nickc at redhat dot com [mailto:sourceware-bugzi...@sourceware.org] Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 9:26 AM To: Tovrea, George W (US SSA) Subject: [Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores ------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-09-14 16:26 ------- Hi Bill, > Not sure why you need simple.o since it is "simple" to compile, Because without it I have to create a compiler and then compile simple.cc. Plus I have to hope that I am using the same set of compiler sources as you and that I have configured the compiler in the same way. > but it and xerces 28 are attached Well the simple.o file appears to be missing, but I had a go at creating one for myself. As a result I have created a workaround patch which *may* work. Please give it a go and see if it helps. I am not familiar with this particular area of the linker though, so this is definitely a workaround not a fix. Cheers Nick -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10629 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
