------- Additional Comments From george dot tovrea at baesystems dot com 2009-09-14 20:11 ------- Subject: RE: GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores
Thanks for the patch. I'll give it a try. The internet-Nazis on my end blocked simple.o for some reason (even though they didn't seem to block the .so). But then again, there seems to no rhyme nor reason to their methods; they even block Dilbert ;-))). -----Original Message----- From: nickc at redhat dot com [mailto:sourceware-bugzi...@sourceware.org] Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 9:26 AM To: Tovrea, George W (US SSA) Subject: [Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores ------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-09-14 16:26 ------- Hi Bill, > Not sure why you need simple.o since it is "simple" to compile, Because without it I have to create a compiler and then compile simple.cc. Plus I have to hope that I am using the same set of compiler sources as you and that I have configured the compiler in the same way. > but it and xerces 28 are attached Well the simple.o file appears to be missing, but I had a go at creating one for myself. As a result I have created a workaround patch which *may* work. Please give it a go and see if it helps. I am not familiar with this particular area of the linker though, so this is definitely a workaround not a fix. Cheers Nick -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10629 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
