https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
Christophe Monat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
--- Comment #11 from Christophe Monat ---
Hi Nick,
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #8)
> Patch approved - please apply.
Thanks for your approval, Christophe Lyon has applied it.
As it is a bug which is also present in 2_26, would y
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
--- Comment #10 from Christophe Monat ---
Created attachment 9244
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9244&action=edit
Patch corresponding to final patch created on top of
origin/binutils-2_26-branch
Patch created on top o
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
--- Comment #7 from Christophe Monat ---
Created attachment 9236
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9236&action=edit
ChangeLog contribution corresponding to the updated patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
Christophe Monat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christophe.monat at st dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
--- Comment #5 from Christophe Monat ---
Hi Nick,
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #4)
> Would it be OK if you created the final draft of the patch ? I have just
> started working on an x86 bug...
Yes, I agree to propose a draft for t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
--- Comment #3 from Christophe Monat ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1)
Hi Nick,
> Will something like this do ?
Thanks for this, it looks good, but I am seeing that the DP registers are
grouped by pairs whereas they could be g
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
--- Comment #2 from Christophe Monat ---
Created attachment 9234
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9234&action=edit
Alternate patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
Christophe Monat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||laurent.alfonsi at st dot com
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
Christophe Monat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christophe.lyon at st dot com
--
|unassigned at sourceware dot org |christophe.monat at st
dot com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: christophe.monat at st dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 9228
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19744
Christophe Monat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--
You are receiving this
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19744
--- Comment #4 from Christophe Monat ---
Charles,
The bug is fixed from our standpoint.
I don't know the transition rules applied here, but my best guess it that you,
as the original reporter of the BZ, is the one who can legitimately close
|unassigned at sourceware dot org |christophe.monat at st
dot com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19744
--- Comment #1 from Christophe Monat ---
Hi Charles,
We did not design these relocations to be usable in T2, indeed, since in
that case the movt/movw instructions fill the bill.
Besides the test case, would there be a strong reason to actua
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19744
Christophe Monat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christophe.monat at st dot com
17 matches
Mail list logo
