https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
--- Comment #3 from Christophe Monat <christophe.monat at st dot com> --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1) Hi Nick, > Will something like this do ? Thanks for this, it looks good, but I am seeing that the DP registers are grouped by pairs whereas they could be group by four, meaning that we could keep only one veneer size for VLDM veneers. I have attached an alternate patch (maybe a little bit rough, but to get the idea rapidly) that sticks to the original VLDM veneers size, certainly the same idea, but enabling a denser packing of the DP registers. By proceeding like this (dealing with chunks instead of registers) the change in bdf/elf32-arm.c is less intrusive. In you patch, I am seeing also some factorization when creating the new_insn for instance, that certainly are worth doing. So if we could agree on a mix of the two changes, it would be great. Best, --C -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
