It seems http://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/ should be regenerated for
the new 2.19.1?
Thanks,
Karl
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
Hi Nick,
Not really. You could refer the reader to the binutils web site:
But, as I mentioned, we need one. Although referring to the general web
site suffices for human questions, it doesn't help when other Texinfo
manuals need to do an @xref to a node inside the binutils manuals, or
for m
Is there a version-independent url for binutils documentation?
All I could find is http://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.18.
Without one, it's very difficult for other Texinfo manuals and web pages
to refer to the doc ...
Help?
Thanks,
karl
___
bug-
Yes please. (With a changelog entry :-)
Please also retrieve/commit the current fdl.texi from the indicated
url, or things won't work ...
Thanks,
k
2007-11-04 Karl Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* doc/binutils.texi: Update to FDL 1.2.
(Top): consistent punctuat
Thanks very much. I have applied your patch along with this changelog
entry.
Thanks Nick. Sorry for not writing the ChangeLog entry.
There's one more issue I forgot to write about: right now the license
used is the FDL 1.1, but the current version is 1.2, and has been for
quite a while. I
We received this question on webmasters (thanks, Tiron), so forwarding ...
Subject:Question about the binutils package
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 01:48:08 -0800 (PST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Tiron Adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello Sirs,
I was looking through the sources of objdump
There isn't a copy of the manual there;
There is an old binutils manual in CVS at
http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/manual. Although it wasn't linked
from the binutils page, it was linked from gnu.org/manual. That's what
H-P noticed and reported to webmasters.
Or, did you mean addin
Greetings,
Hans-Peter (cc'd) suggested to the GNU webmasters that the binutils doc
on http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils be kept to date, and also that
information about this would be useful. So here it is. If irrelevant
to you, please ignore, and sorry to bother.
In brief, perhaps the most c
