https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27211
Bug ID: 27211
Summary: m68k: word branches are not checked for signed
overflow
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27210
Fangrui Song changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ccoutant at gmail dot com
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27210
--- Comment #7 from Fangrui Song ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> (In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #5)
> > The explanation is not convincing. foo and foo@v1 are two different
> > symbols.
> > My example does not use an undef
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27210
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #5)
> The explanation is not convincing. foo and foo@v1 are two different symbols.
> My example does not use an undefined symbol so I don't see how
>
> > shouldn't be use
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27210
--- Comment #5 from Fangrui Song ---
The explanation is not convincing. foo and foo@v1 are two different symbols.
My example does not use an undefined symbol so I don't see how
> shouldn't be used by ld to satisfy the unversioned reference.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27210
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27203
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Status|ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27210
Fangrui Song changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|NOTABUG
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27210
--- Comment #2 from Fangrui Song ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> (In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #0)
> > cat > a.s < > .globl foo
> > .symver foo, foo@v1
> > foo: nop
> > eof
> > echo 'v1 {};' > a.ver
> > cat > b.s < > .glob
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27210
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27210
Bug ID: 27210
Summary: ld: Don't suppress foo if foo@v1 is defined
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Co
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27206
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Tom Kacvinsky from comment #6)
> For compatibility reasons, I want to update my automated build machine, but
> build GCC and auxiliary support libraries in such a fashion that we can
> target older
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27206
--- Comment #6 from Tom Kacvinsky ---
For compatibility reasons, I want to update my automated build machine, but
build GCC and auxiliary support libraries in such a fashion that we can target
older Linux distributions That is, build on a mach
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27206
Fangrui Song changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i at maskray dot me
--- Comment #5 fro
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27206
--- Comment #4 from Tom Kacvinsky ---
This worked for me in my simple reproducer, but unfortunately we are doing
"naughty" things with third party code build such that a linker map is not an
option, unless we hack that library's build process.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22326
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24276
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27206
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
---
__asm__(".symver pthread_key_create,pthread_key_create@GLIBC_2.2.5,remove");
---
A versioned symbol must be defined in an object. Try this
[hjl@gnu-cfl-2 pr27206]$ cat libfoo.map
GLIBC_2.2.5 {
global:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27206
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3351
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||27206
Referenced Bugs:
https://sourceware.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27206
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||3351
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
(In r
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27206
--- Comment #2 from Tom Kacvinsky ---
I know you mentioned this message comes from the referenced PR, but is what I
am seeing an unintended consequence of the change made in this PR, or is this
expected behavior?
--
You are receiving this ma
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27206
Bug ID: 27206
Summary: .symver overrides .weak
Product: binutils
Version: 2.36
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27200
--- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 13133
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13133&action=edit
Proposed patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27200
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-01-19
Status|UNCONFIR
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27203
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #2)
> I generated a patch to change powerpc64 to use R_PPC64_IRELATIVE in this
> situation, but now I'm wondering if such a change is a good idea. IRELATIVE
> relocs must be
26 matches
Mail list logo
