https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27210
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #5) > The explanation is not convincing. foo and foo@v1 are two different symbols. > My example does not use an undefined symbol so I don't see how > > > shouldn't be used by ld to satisfy the unversioned reference. > > is relevant. In a DSO, only foo and foo@@VERSION can point to the same definition in .dynsym. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
