https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27203
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #2) > I generated a patch to change powerpc64 to use R_PPC64_IRELATIVE in this > situation, but now I'm wondering if such a change is a good idea. IRELATIVE > relocs must be resolved at program startup whereas JMP_SLOT can be resolved > lazily. So we'd be slowing down program startup for no benefit at all if > the function is never called, and only saving ld.so symbol resolution time > if the function is called. > > I'm inclined to think this isn't a good idea. Will it help https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23169 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
