[Bug ld/20113] Partial relro support for s390x ld

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20113 --- Comment #14 from Andreas Krebbel --- Maamoun, was your patch ever posted on the Binutils mailing list? I could not find it there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _

[Bug binutils/24243] readelf: heap buffer overflow in process_mips_specific

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24243 --- Comment #3 from spinpx --- CVE-2019-9077 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mai

[Bug binutils/24236] size: Heap buffer overflow in _bfd_archive_64_bit_slurp_armap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24236 --- Comment #4 from spinpx --- CVE-2019-9075 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mai

[Bug binutils/24235] objdump: Read memory violation in libbfd.c

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24235 --- Comment #5 from spinpx --- CVE-2019-9074 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mai

[Bug gas/24258] v8.5 extension "frintts" missing as a separate feature

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24258 --- Comment #6 from Richard Henderson --- All you've told me here so far is that there are more missing bits. So, what, is ARM changing its collective mind about maintaining aarch64_features? If you're going to stop adding flags to .arch, wh

[Bug binutils/24235] objdump: Read memory violation in libbfd.c

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24235 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||u6759601 at anu dot edu.au --- Comment #

[Bug binutils/24278] pdata section wrong filepos - segmentation fault

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24278 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/24272] An out-of-bounds read occured in pex64_xdata_print_uwd_codes()

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24272 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/24272] An out-of-bounds read occured in pex64_xdata_print_uwd_codes()

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24272 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b24cc4146e4de9f3b66e2e2fb8379db46eff89c9 commit b24cc4146e4de9f3b66e2e2fb8379

[Bug binutils/24272] An out-of-bounds read occured in pex64_xdata_print_uwd_codes()

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24272 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gas/24258] v8.5 extension "frintts" missing as a separate feature

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24258 --- Comment #5 from Sudakshina Das --- If we take Armv8.5-A as an example and if we check include/opcode/aarch64.h for all the new feature bits added /* Flag Manipulation insns. */ #define AARCH64_FEATURE_FLAGMANIP 0x40ULL /* F

[Bug gas/24279] ARMv8.5 extension incorrectly named "predres" instead of "predinv"

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24279 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gas/24258] v8.5 extension "frintts" missing as a separate feature

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24258 --- Comment #4 from Richard Henderson --- But we *do* make every other feature optional. That is exactly my point -- frintts is the odd man out. See aarch64_features[], where we currently list 24 of these. -- You are receiving this mail bec

[Bug ld/24267] ld discards a symbol with -flto and -static

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267 --- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #16) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #15) > > Yes, both return: > > > > ... > > 262 545ca41eb4de6c9c PREVAILING_DEF _ZNKSt5ctypeIcE8do_widenEc > > Since it is refere

[Bug ld/24267] ld discards a symbol with -flto and -static

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267 --- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #15) > Yes, both return: > > ... > 262 545ca41eb4de6c9c PREVAILING_DEF _ZNKSt5ctypeIcE8do_widenEc Since it is referenced from istream-inst.o, it must be _ZNKSt5ctypeIcE8

[Bug binutils/24273] An out-of-bounds read in bfd_hash_hash()

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24273 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=eed5def8d0b7b64c3592be75a9b22bb4ce1a78f4 commit eed5def8d0b7b64c3592be75a9b

[Bug binutils/24273] An out-of-bounds read in bfd_hash_hash()

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24273 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/24267] ld discards a symbol with -flto and -static

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267 --- Comment #15 from Martin Liška --- Yes, both return: ... 262 545ca41eb4de6c9c PREVAILING_DEF _ZNKSt5ctypeIcE8do_widenEc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _

[Bug ld/24267] ld discards a symbol with -flto and -static

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267 --- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #13) > > > > What do ELF linkers (gold and bfd) get? > > We get: > > (gdb) p owner_sec->owner->filename > $5 = 0x69ae80 "main.o (symbol from plugin)" Do gold and bfd g

[Bug ld/24267] ld discards a symbol with -flto and -static

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267 --- Comment #13 from Martin Liška --- > > What do ELF linkers (gold and bfd) get? We get: (gdb) p owner_sec->owner->filename $5 = 0x69ae80 "main.o (symbol from plugin)" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for th

[Bug ld/24267] ld discards a symbol with -flto and -static

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #11) > I've got a patch candidate that can solve it: > > diff --git a/bfd/coffgen.c b/bfd/coffgen.c > index 309e1249ac..1d200b066b 100644 > --- a/bfd/coffgen.c > +++ b/bf

[Bug ld/24267] ld discards a symbol with -flto and -static

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267 --- Comment #11 from Martin Liška --- I've got a patch candidate that can solve it: diff --git a/bfd/coffgen.c b/bfd/coffgen.c index 309e1249ac..1d200b066b 100644 --- a/bfd/coffgen.c +++ b/bfd/coffgen.c @@ -2678,9 +2678,9 @@ _bfd_coff_section

[Bug gold/20114] Partial relro support for s390x gold

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20114 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||krebbel at linux dot ibm.com -- Yo

[Bug gas/24258] v8.5 extension "frintts" missing as a separate feature

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24258 --- Comment #3 from Sudakshina Das --- Hi Richard Sorry for the delay in getting back on this. I agree that the specs say that any Armv8.[N+1] feature is optional on Armv8.x. However in order to implement that, we would have to make every fea

[Bug gas/24279] ARMv8.5 extension incorrectly named "predres" instead of "predinv"

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24279 --- Comment #2 from Sudakshina Das --- Hi Richard We chose the name based on what instructions it is turning on - [Control Flow/Data Value/Cache Prefetch] Prediction Restriction by Context I agree that the internal naming is different. Howeve

[Bug ld/20113] Partial relro support for s390x ld

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20113 --- Comment #13 from Andreas Krebbel --- Unfortunately the patch also went into 2.32 release :( At least for 64 bit the patch doesn't hurt since it is a nop. The code currently looks like: EXTRA_EM_FILE=s390 SEPARATE_GOTPLT=24 <--- the

[Bug ld/20113] Partial relro support for s390x ld

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20113 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||krebbel at linux dot ibm.com --- Co

[Bug binutils/24281] Failed with “thin archive” if it contain subdir's object file

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24281 lol lol changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.26|2.32 --- Comment #1 from lol lol --- Bug w

[Bug binutils/24281] New: Failed with “thin archive” if it contain subdir's object file

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24281 Bug ID: 24281 Summary: Failed with “thin archive” if it contain subdir's object file Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal