https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #11)
> I've got a patch candidate that can solve it:
>
> diff --git a/bfd/coffgen.c b/bfd/coffgen.c
> index 309e1249ac..1d200b066b 100644
> --- a/bfd/coffgen.c
> +++ b/bfd/coffgen.c
> @@ -2678,9 +2678,9 @@ _bfd_coff_section_already_linked (bfd *abfd,
> and match any comdat section with comdat name of <key>, and
> any linkonce section with the same suffix, ie.
> .gnu.linkonce.*.<key>. */
> - if (((s_comdat != NULL) == (l_comdat != NULL)
> - && strcmp (name, l->sec->name) == 0)
> - || (l->sec->owner->flags & BFD_PLUGIN) != 0)
> + if (((s_comdat != NULL) == (l_comdat != NULL))
> + && ((strcmp (name, l->sec->name) == 0)
> + || (l->sec->owner->flags & BFD_PLUGIN) != 0))
> {
> /* The section has already been linked. See if we should
> issue a warning. */
>
> However, Honza is still thinking that LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY should be
> used for the symbol. If I see correctly it's set in ld/plugin.c base on
> else if (owner_sec->owner == abfd).
What do ELF linkers (gold and bfd) get?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
