https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24258
--- Comment #6 from Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- All you've told me here so far is that there are more missing bits. So, what, is ARM changing its collective mind about maintaining aarch64_features? If you're going to stop adding flags to .arch, what is the point of having .arch at all? You might as well go the way of x86 and just accept all opcodes all of the time. Save the programmer the hassle of trying to work out what spelling turns on the insn within the assembler. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
