Re: depcomp testing

2006-03-27 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 07:26:31AM CET: > >>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > RW> OK to apply this patch? Sorry about all that noise. > > Sure! Done. Thanks!

Re: depcomp testing

2006-03-22 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: RW> OK to apply this patch? Sorry about all that noise. Sure! -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz Shared books are happy books. http://www.bookcrossing.com/friend/gadl

Re: depcomp testing

2006-03-20 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 11:06:36AM CET: > On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 07:13:44AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 06:46:24AM CET: > [about "if $MAKE; then false; fi"] > > > * Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at

Re: depcomp testing

2006-03-20 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 07:13:44AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 06:46:24AM CET: [about "if $MAKE; then false; fi"] > > * Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 07:28:14AM CET: > > > Let's write "$MAKE && exit 1" because that's what of t

Re: depcomp testing

2006-03-18 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 06:46:24AM CET: > * Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 07:28:14AM CET: > > Let's write "$MAKE && exit 1" because that's what of the other test do, and > > I'm wary that some shell will return the $? of $MAKE if it fails, in turn > > ca

Re: depcomp testing

2006-03-18 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 07:28:14AM CET: > >>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The extra test look useful even without this point, so please go > ahead and check them. Thanks. Applied with your comments addressed. > RW> + sleep 1 > > Just us

Re: depcomp testing

2006-03-17 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Sorry for the delay, >>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] RW> Below, there's also a hack for depmodes hp/gcc to not output `foo.c :' RW> lines. It's a hack because `grep -v "^$source$"' is bad when $source RW> contains regex-active characters, but was the simplest I

Re: depcomp testing

2006-01-05 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 08:10:11PM CET: > > Below, there's also a hack for depmodes hp/gcc to not output `foo.c :' > lines. It's a hack because `grep -v "^$source$"' is bad when $source > contains regex-active characters, but was the simplest I could come up > with. Bette

depcomp testing (was: depcomp: support newer HP compilers)

2006-01-04 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Alexandre, * Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 01:11:25AM CET: > > RW> Note that ia64hp style, unlike tru64, removes all possible tmpdepfiles > RW> with this patch. It may be useful to change tru64 style to do this as > RW> well. > > I confess I can't see why it's useful,