Re: bug#14499: broken texi2dvi causes a FAIL in t/txinfo-no-split.sh

On 2013-05-29 11:50, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On 05/29/2013 08:33 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> Hi! >> >> On MSYS, I have this situation: >> >> $ texi2dvi --version >> You don't have a working TeX binary installed, but the texi2dvi script >> can't proceed without it. If you want to use this script, y

Re: Always use -c -o when compiling C

On 2013-05-30 00:39, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On 05/30/2013 12:14 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I just tried the testsuite on maint with MSYS/MSVC and I have one >> failure, namely in silent-many-languages.sh. The reason it fails is >> that while I have specified MSVC as the C and C++ compi

Re: Always use -c -o when compiling C

On 05/30/2013 12:14 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: > Hi! > > I just tried the testsuite on maint with MSYS/MSVC and I have one > failure, namely in silent-many-languages.sh. The reason it fails is > that while I have specified MSVC as the C and C++ compiler, I didn't > bother to say that I wasn't interest

Always use -c -o when compiling C

Hi! I just tried the testsuite on maint with MSYS/MSVC and I have one failure, namely in silent-many-languages.sh. The reason it fails is that while I have specified MSVC as the C and C++ compiler, I didn't bother to say that I wasn't interested in fortran. The many-lang test then mixes the output

Re: Remaining failures and patches

On 05/29/2013 07:55 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2013-05-29 18:20, Stefano Lattarini wrote: Nice, thank you. Now only bug#14499 remains to be addressed, right? Does the patch I sent fix the issue? >>> >>> bug#14501 also remains, >>> >> OK, but it is my understand that you already have a f

Re: Remaining failures and patches

On 2013-05-29 18:20, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >>> Nice, thank you. Now only bug#14499 remains to be addressed, right? >>> Does the patch I sent fix the issue? >> >> bug#14501 also remains, >> > OK, but it is my understand that you already have a fix for it (the > extra echo), and just need to wrap

Remaining failures and patches (was: Re: bug#14494: ./test-driver missing in t/distcheck-pr10470.sh)

[drop bug#14494 from CC:] On 05/29/2013 05:50 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2013-05-29 17:35, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >> On 05/29/2013 05:20 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> On 2013-05-29 16:54, Stefano Lattarini wrote: What if you do something like: $EGREP "(^| )(rm|find):.*$distdir" ou

Re: bug#14494: ./test-driver missing in t/distcheck-pr10470.sh

On 2013-05-29 17:35, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On 05/29/2013 05:20 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2013-05-29 16:54, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >>> What if you do something like: >>> >>> $EGREP "(^| )(rm|find):.*$distdir" output >>> >>> instead? >> >> Yup, that did it. Thanks! >> >> I'm pushing the f

Re: bug#14494: ./test-driver missing in t/distcheck-pr10470.sh

On 05/29/2013 05:20 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2013-05-29 16:54, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >> What if you do something like: >> >> $EGREP "(^| )(rm|find):.*$distdir" output >> >> instead? > > Yup, that did it. Thanks! > > I'm pushing the following. > Nice, thank you. Now only bug#14499 remain

Re: bug#14494: ./test-driver missing in t/distcheck-pr10470.sh

On 2013-05-29 16:54, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > What if you do something like: > > $EGREP "(^| )(rm|find):.*$distdir" output > > instead? Yup, that did it. Thanks! I'm pushing the following. Cheers, Peter >From eb33ae2b29f33bcf65afc036c9a92a61f77f75e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter

Re: bug#14493: MSYS line ending problem in t/cxx-demo.sh

On 2013-05-29 16:18, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > Yeah, let's got for this (with a comment like "zap carriage-return characters, > for MinGW/MSYS" ;-). No need to over-complicate stuff. If in a few days I'll > still be convinced that it's worth making this conditional to MinGW, I'll do > that mysel

[FYI] Merge branch 'micro' into master

commit 649c03b464cf55f50e696ebea482c65339ff4832 Merge: c98d523 eefd01b Author: Stefano Lattarini Date: Wed May 29 14:54:47 2013 +0200 Merge branch 'micro' into maint * micro: t/README: document "run_make", discourage "make -e" cosmetics: tiny whitespace fixlets tests:

[FYI] {micro} t/README: document "run_make", discourage "make -e"

Signed-off-by: Stefano Lattarini --- t/README | 28 ++-- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/t/README b/t/README index 60eb7c7..23dd943 100644 --- a/t/README +++ b/t/README @@ -200,6 +200,24 @@ Writing test cases $PERL, $MAKE, $EGREP, and $FG

Re: bug#14498: Failure with MSVC in t/yacc-bison-skeleton.sh

On 2013-05-29 11:56, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On 05/29/2013 11:54 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> diff --git a/t/yacc-bison-skeleton.sh b/t/yacc-bison-skeleton.sh >> index b89d44c..3dfc83f 100644 >> --- a/t/yacc-bison-skeleton.sh >> +++ b/t/yacc-bison-skeleton.sh >> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ required='cc bison

Re: bug#14495: unistd.h problem in t/lex-header.sh

On 2013-05-29 11:51, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On 05/29/2013 11:43 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> diff --git a/t/lex-header.sh b/t/lex-header.sh >> index 005ae86..0789af4 100644 >> --- a/t/lex-header.sh >> +++ b/t/lex-header.sh >> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ cat > lexer.l << 'END' >> END >> >> cat > main.c <<'

Re: bug#14499: broken texi2dvi causes a FAIL in t/txinfo-no-split.sh

On 05/29/2013 08:33 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: > Hi! > > On MSYS, I have this situation: > > $ texi2dvi --version > You don't have a working TeX binary installed, but the texi2dvi script > can't proceed without it. If you want to use this script, you have to > install some kind of TeX, for example th

Re: bug#14500: t/subpkg.sh fails when $CC is not cc

On 05/29/2013 09:24 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: > Hi! > > I'm configuring Automake master (baf8a1c22acce0908) with: > > ./configure CC=".../compile cl ..." ... > > This appears to cause the below FAIL in t/subpkg.sh. > > Cheers, > Peter > > *snip* > checking whether /home/peda/automake/lib/compile

Re: [PATCH 0/8] Fix automake bug#14441, and related minor refactorings

On 05/28/2013 11:45 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > Reference: > > > I plan to push this (to 'micro') in a day or so. > > Stefano Lattarini (8): > tests: expose automake bug#14441 > Automake::Rule: expose suffix rules as a function, not a sc

Re: [FYI] {micro} tests: remove exec bit from all of them ('micro' branch)

On 05/29/2013 01:25 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2013-05-16 13:35, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >> It gives the impression that they are directly runnable, as with >> "./t/foo.sh", but it has been a while since that was the case. Today, >> tests are runnable only through "make check" or "./runtest". >

Re: Planning betas and releases

On 05/29/2013 12:36 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2013-05-28 21:29, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >> Hi Peter. >> >> On 05/28/2013 09:09 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> On 2013-05-28 20:10, Stefano Lattarini wrote: +7 >>> >>> You have a mysterious traili