On 28 April 2024 15:01:27 GMT+02:00, a.m.wollmar...@miluriel.info wrote:
>A parcel was already provided by me with the suffix BIN. This was not correct
>either.
>
>You are not following your own rules.
>
>It is not a rebuild. It downloads the DEB package directly and uses it
>directly. No rebuild
A parcel was already provided by me with the suffix BIN. This was not
correct either.
You are not following your own rules.
It is not a rebuild. It downloads the DEB package directly and uses it
directly. No rebuild, recompiling. Nothing like that. Direct use of the
manufacturer package.
On
On 28 April 2024 13:16:50 GMT+02:00, "André M. Wollmarker"
wrote:
>This package will be updated as soon as I receive an EOL message.
>It is 100% based on the deb package from the original developers and thus
>minimises some of the problems I and others have with the Arch package.
>It is therefor
This package will be updated as soon as I receive an EOL message.
It is 100% based on the deb package from the original developers and thus
minimises some of the problems I and others have with the Arch package.
It is therefore not incorrectly labelled.
Deb is in the name and is referred to in the
