On 28 April 2024 13:16:50 GMT+02:00, "André M. Wollmarker" <a.m.wollmar...@miluriel.info> wrote: >This package will be updated as soon as I receive an EOL message. >It is 100% based on the deb package from the original developers and thus >minimises some of the problems I and others have with the Arch package. >It is therefore not incorrectly labelled. >Deb is in the name and is referred to in the description. >So it definitely has benefits. >Am Sonntag, 28. April 2024, 11:40:26 MESZ schrieben Sie: >> MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for element-desktop-deb-package >> [2]: >> >> Unneeded. Exists in Arch extra repo. [a] >> >> Less frequently updated than the repo package. >> Has wrong pkgname. >> >> There's absolutely zero benefit in keeping it on AUR. >> >> [a]: >> https://archlinux.org/packages/?q=element-desktop >> >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ >> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/element-desktop-deb-package/ > > > > > >
As per AUR submission guidelines, if there are issues with a repo package, don't create duplicates of it on AUR, but create an Arch package issue. Also, AUR packages that use prebuilt artifacts of open-source code must be named with a '-bin' suffix. This is the second time you submitted an element-desktop binary package to AUR with wrong name. Thus, you have already defied an AUR PM's deletion decision.
