A parcel was already provided by me with the suffix BIN. This was not
correct either.
You are not following your own rules.
It is not a rebuild. It downloads the DEB package directly and uses it
directly. No rebuild, recompiling. Nothing like that. Direct use of the
manufacturer package.
One last time I ask, what exactly do you want and what are your
requirements to accept it. Otherwise that's it with my cooperation in
the sense of the Linux idea that everyone helps each other.
Am 2024-04-28 14:12, schrieb Marcell Meszaros:
On 28 April 2024 13:16:50 GMT+02:00, "André M. Wollmarker"
<a.m.wollmar...@miluriel.info> wrote: This package will be updated as
soon as I receive an EOL message.
It is 100% based on the deb package from the original developers and
thus
minimises some of the problems I and others have with the Arch package.
It is therefore not incorrectly labelled.
Deb is in the name and is referred to in the description.
So it definitely has benefits.
Am Sonntag, 28. April 2024, 11:40:26 MESZ schrieben Sie: MarsSeed [1
[1]] filed a deletion request for element-desktop-deb-package
[2 [2]]:
Unneeded. Exists in Arch extra repo. [a]
Less frequently updated than the repo package.
Has wrong pkgname.
There's absolutely zero benefit in keeping it on AUR.
[a]:
https://archlinux.org/packages/?q=element-desktop
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/element-desktop-deb-package/
As per AUR submission guidelines, if there are issues with a repo
package, don't create duplicates of it on AUR, but create an Arch
package issue.
Also, AUR packages that use prebuilt artifacts of open-source code must
be named with a '-bin' suffix.
This is the second time you submitted an element-desktop binary package
to AUR with wrong name. Thus, you have already defied an AUR PM's
deletion decision.
Links:
------
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/element-desktop-deb-package/
