[PRQ#60221] Orphan Request for trustedqsl Rejected

2024-05-18 Thread notify
Request #60221 has been Rejected by Muflone [1]: not a valid reason to orphan the package [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/

Re: [PRQ#60221] Orphan Request for trustedqsl

2024-05-13 Thread nmlibertarian
I went ahead and "updated" the PKGBUILD because namcap reports "custom: " in the license field as wrong ALBEIT the Pcakge Guidelines published in the wiki declare otherwise...sigh. On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 6:43 AM wrote: > RE: Orphan request for trustedqsl - PRQ#60221 > > In fact this package alr

Re: [PRQ#60221] Orphan Request for trustedqsl

2024-05-13 Thread nmlibertarian
RE: Orphan request for trustedqsl - PRQ#60221 In fact this package already conforms to the Package Guidelines, as currently published: " For custom licenses the identifier should be either LicenseRef-license-name or custom:license-name, if they are not covered by the common families mentioned abo

[PRQ#60221] Orphan Request for trustedqsl

2024-05-13 Thread notify
Coelacanthus [1] filed an orphan request for trustedqsl [2]: This package doesn't follow licenses section of Package Guideline and RFC 16. I submitted a comment on AUR but received no response or update for four months. https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#license https://gitlab.archlinux.or